PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Review of Chimei Jion Tenyorei by Motoori Norinaga

KNKohei Nishimura

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze and critique the patterns of Sino-Japanese readings in old Japanese place names as explored by Motoori Norinaga.
  • Organized overview of CJT, a 46-page study published in 1800.
  • Investigation of unconventional kanji readings in historical place names.
  • Discussion of the author's assumptions regarding phonological structures.
  • Identified jion reading patterns in place names were more systematic than previously understood.
  • Critiqued the assumptions about the phonological structures underlying jion readings as flawed.

Abstract

This article provides an overview and critique of Chimei Jion Tenyorei (地 名 字音転用例 Examples of Sino-Japanese Reading Diversion in Place Names; hereafter CJT) , one of the most important works of Motoori Norinaga in his study of jion readings (Sino-Japanese readings), published as a 46-page booklet in 1800.This study organizes and investigates the patterns of unconventional jion readings of kanji found in old place names in Japan, showing that these patterns were more systematic than previously thought.The author, Motoori Norinaga (1730-1801), was a Kokugaku (Japanese National Studies) scholar during the Edo period, and is often regarded as the one of most influential figures in this traditional academic area.Although his main purpose was to investigate Japan's indigenous philosophy, his scope of study ranged from philology and classical literature to graphology and many other related areas.The study of kanji usage in ancient Japanese texts was also one of his important academic topics, which he thought was necessary for understanding the philosophy of ancient Japan, his most important lifelong academic subject.This article first provides an overview of the study, followed by a discussion of its flaws, focusing on the author's assumption about the underlying phonological structure of jion in place names.Arguably, this problematic supposition stems from the fundamental ideology of the author's academic activities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kohei Nishimura (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e726230b38c64201b5a0ehttps://doi.org/10.34321/tf02141442
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Speech, Text, and Reality: <em>Kokugaku</em> and the Buddhist Roots of Japanese Philology2025
  2. 2Buddhist Esoteric Theory of Language in the Kokugaku School2024
  3. 3Tungusic Cluster-Based Phonological Analysis Method: A Formal Definition and Analytical Framework2025
  4. 4Tungusic Cluster-Based Phonological Analysis Method: A Formal Definition and Analytical Framework2025
  5. 5THE NAITŌ HYPOSTASIS: NAITŌ KONAN (1866–1934) AND THE JAPANESE IMPERIALIST LEGACY IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF MIDDLE‐PERIOD CHINA (800–1400 CE)2026