PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Energy and AI1 citationsOpen Access

Embedding composite failure mechanics into neural networks: A physics-constrained framework for dual-criteria failure assessment of Type IV pressure vessels

View Full Paper
YQY. QarssisMNM. NachtaneBBB. Ben Brayek

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a rapid assessment framework for predicting failure in Type IV pressure vessels using physics-constrained neural networks.
  • Developed a dual-output neural network framework with embedded failure criteria (Puck and Hashin) as penalty terms in the loss function.
  • Validated against experimental burst tests on a glass/epoxy vessel and cross-validated with four independent burst-pressure cases.
  • Trained on a dataset of 2,000 carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer configurations with a significant computational speedup.
  • Achieved prediction errors of 0.63% (Puck) and 2.48% (Hashin) with a coefficient of determination of 0.941.
  • Demonstrated a root-mean-square error of 0.066 and a computational speedup of approximately 1.8 million times compared to finite element simulations.
  • Physics-based regularisation reduced performance degradation under extrapolation by half, achieving 7.1% versus 14.7% in conventional networks.

Abstract

The transition toward hydrogen-based mobility demands lightweight, high-pressure storage systems with guaranteed structural integrity. Type IV composite overwrapped pressure vessels fulfil this role, yet their design optimisation remains constrained by the computational cost of high-fidelity finite element analysis. This study presents a physics-constrained neural network framework for rapid dual-criteria failure prediction in Type IV vessels. A finite element model is validated against experimental burst tests on a glass/epoxy vessel, achieving prediction errors of 0.63% and 2.48% for the Puck and Hashin criteria, respectively, and cross-validated against four independent burst-pressure cases spanning 20 to 70 MPa, with mean absolute errors of 5.0% (Hashin) and 2.8% (Puck). A dataset of 2,000 carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer configurations trains the surrogate, whose architecture embeds the Hashin and Puck criteria as gradient-based penalty terms within the loss function through a dual-output network with adaptive loss weighting. The surrogate achieves a coefficient of determination of 0.941 and a root-mean-square error of 0.066, with a computational speedup of approximately 1.8 million times relative to the finite element simulation. Leave-one-material-out cross-validation confirms that physics-based regularisation halves performance degradation under extrapolation compared with conventional neural networks (7.1% versus 14.7%). The framework is presented as a proof-of-concept for methodology transfer; certification-grade deployment requires a dedicated experimental campaign.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qarssis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e726230b38c64201b5afchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100793
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Heat Transfer Problems2021 · 1,283 citations
  2. 2FEA-Net: A physics-guided data-driven model for efficient mechanical response prediction2020 · 85 citations
  3. 3Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations2018 · 19,218 citations
  4. 4The residual strength of automotive hydrogen cylinders after exposure to flames2018 · 20 citations
  5. 5Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring2021 · 61 citations