PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Experimental Gerontology0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of elastic band training versus free weight training in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
NSNadja SchottPSPhilipp StraßerBHBenjamin Holfelder

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effects of elastic band training and free weight training on functional performance in older adults.
  • Forty-eight participants aged 67.1 ± 5.32 years were randomized into three groups: free weight, elastic band, and control.
  • Participants completed 12 weeks of progressive resistance training, twice a week, with five main exercises.
  • Functional performance was assessed using various strength tests, including stair climbing and the timed up-and-go test.
  • FWG and EBG showed significant improvements in the climbing stairs test (11.4% vs. 11.5%; p = .013) compared to CG.
  • EBG outperformed CG in the 30s chair stand test (19.8% vs. 10.2%; p = .044) and box lift (44.8% vs. 31.8%; p < .001).
  • Both groups demonstrated notable advancements in timed up-and-go tests (11.1% vs. 7.1%; p = .011); no significant changes in chest press and leg press.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aging process is associated with various physiological changes, including declines in muscle strength and mass, which can reduce mobility and increase the risk of falls. Strength training is the most widely recognized strategy for enhancing muscle mass, strength, and function in older adults. Strength training with unstable equipment requires high levels of motor control and the generation of muscle strength. To test this assumption, this study compares the effects of a free-weight and an elastic-band strength-training program on functional performance. METHODS: Forty-eight participants (67.1 ± 5.32 years; 28 men, 20 women) were randomized into three groups: a free-weight group (FWG, n = 16), an elastic band group (EBG, n = 17), and a control group (CG, n = 15). They completed 12 weeks of progressive resistance training, twice a week, with five main exercises designed to strengthen the entire body. Changes in strength were assessed using the 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) on the chest press and leg press. Functional performance was assessed using the following tests: climbing stairs, lifting and setting down a heavy box, the 30-second chair stand test, and the timed up-and-go test (TUG). RESULTS: Both the FWG and EBG demonstrated significant percentage improvements in the climbing stairs test (11.4 vs. 11.5%; p = .013), 30s chair test (10.2 vs. 19.8%; p = .044), box lift (31.8 vs. 44.8%; p < .001), and TUG with bags fast (7.1 vs. 11.1%; p = .011), but not for chest press (7.3% vs. 3.6%; p = .184) and leg press (16.8% vs. 23.9%; .p = .322) compared to the CG. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that resistance training adaptations exhibit high task specificity in older adults, and significant improvements in functional outcomes can be achieved with elastic bands.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schott et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e728f30b38c64201b5ba2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2026.113182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper