PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Folia oecologica0 citationsOpen Access

Biodiversity restoration potential: a comparative study of native species regeneration in natural forests and Liquidambar excelsa plantation forests

NUNi Kadek Erosi UndahartaDUDidi UsmadiEPEnggal Primananda

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare biodiversity and regeneration processes between natural forests and Liquidambar excelsa plantation forests.
  • Analyzed tree species richness across natural forests and Liquidambar excelsa plantations
  • Measured tree density, basal area, and sapling density in both forest types
  • Assessed species similarity and diversity indices for understory vegetation
  • Natural forests had significantly higher tree species richness (44 species) compared to plantations (5 species)
  • Sapling density and basal area were higher in plantation forests while diversity indices showed no significant difference
  • Environment influences native species recruitment in plantations more than forest type, with significant species similarity between forest types

Abstract

Abstract The identification of natural succession and regeneration processes is crucial for the preservation of biodiversity and ecosystem stability in sustainable forest management. This study investigated the biodiversity and regeneration of natural forests and Liquidambar excelsa (Noronha) Oken plantations. Tree species richness (dbh ≥ 10 cm) in natural forests was found to be significantly higher (44 species) than in plantation forests (5 species, 4 of which were natural recruits). Although tree density was higher in natural forests, basal area was lower than in plantations. At the regeneration (sapling) level, species richness did not differ significantly between the two forest types, with a moderate diversity index and high evenness, and a species similarity of 60.7%. However, sapling density and basal area were higher in the plantation forests. For understory vegetation, species richness was also not significantly different, but the diversity index was higher in the natural forests. Both shared a very high species similarity (75.6%), despite the greater density and cover in the natural forests. The successful recruitment of native species into plantations is more influenced by environmental factors such as proximity to natural forest seed sources and topography, rather than by the forest type itself. This is demonstrated by the discovery of L. excelsa seedlings in natural forests and the presence of several native species that have successfully regenerated in plantation forests, indicating the potential for biodiversity restoration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Undaharta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e728f30b38c64201b5cd8https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2026-0008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The role of land‐use history in driving successional pathways and its implications for the restoration of tropical forests2021 · 227 citations
  2. 2What causes deforestation in Indonesia?2018 · 476 citations
  3. 3The State of the World’s Forests 20202020 · 511 citations
  4. 4Penyebaran Dan Karakteristik Habitat Jenis Rasamal (Altingia excelsa Noronha) di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak2019 · 8 citations
  5. 5Liquidambar excelsa: Beech, E., Crowley, D. & Wilson, B.2018 · 1 citations