PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Circulation0 citations

Standardized End Point Definitions for Clinical Trials in Thoracic Aortic Repair: A Consensus Report From the ARCH–Academic Research Consortium

View Full Paper
ABAdam W. BeckNDNimesh D. DesaiDADorothy Abel

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop standardized definitions for clinical endpoints in thoracic aortic repair trials to enhance clarity and consistency in research.
  • The ARCH-ARC team, consisting of international experts from various medical fields, held virtual meetings from 2021 to 2025.
  • Consensus was achieved to standardize definitions and identify clinical end points specific to aortic arch procedures.
  • The focus was on end points related to aortic arch anatomy, pathology, and procedural types, including endovascular and hybrid methods.
  • The consensus provides a standardized framework for clinical endpoints in trials involving ascending aorta and arch devices.
  • Implementation of these definitions is expected to enhance event reporting and adjudication processes in clinical studies.
  • The outcomes aim to facilitate better comparison among studies in thoracic aortic repairs.

Abstract

Innovation in the treatment of ascending aorta and arch pathology with novel catheter-based and hybrid procedures has driven the need for a strategy to guide their safe application. The ARCH-ARC (Aortic Arch Academic Research Consortium) was established to pragmatically develop consistent clinical end points and to standardize definitions for use in studies of these new technologies. The ARCH-ARC team, consisting of independent international specialists in cardiac surgery, vascular surgery, vascular medicine, cardiology, neurology, radiology, and clinical trials, along with US Food and Drug Administration, industry, and contract research organization representatives, held virtual meetings from 2021 to 2025. Consensus was used to identify appropriate clinical end points and to standardize definitions of end points for endovascular, hybrid, and open surgical procedures in clinical trials in the ascending aorta and arch. Drawing on previous ARC work in cardiac, neurological, renal, and bleeding end points, the ARCH-ARC focused on definitions and end points related to aortic arch–specific anatomy, pathology, and procedures and clinical, device, and imaging. The adoption of the ARCH-ARC consensus definitions and end points will provide a template for consistent adjudication and event reporting and facilitate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices for ascending aorta and arch pathology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ef47655d924476d7d9fc3https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.125.078803
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Malperfusion Secondary to Type A Aortic Dissection2018 · 67 citations
  2. 2Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials2011 · 4,517 citations
  3. 3Endograft Collapse After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair2010 · 80 citations
  4. 4Impact of Surgical Stroke on the Early and Late Outcomes After Thoracic Aortic Operations2015 · 24 citations
  5. 5STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.1963 · 12,351 citations