PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026BMC Medical Education0 citationsOpen Access

The Anatomage table in medical education: perceptions and associated factors among students in Rwanda

AMAbebe MucheABAbebe BekelePOPatrick Orikiriza

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess perceived educational benefits of the Anatomage Table among medical students in Rwanda.
  • Cross-sectional analytical study
  • Survey conducted with 148 medical students using a validated questionnaire
  • Data analyzed with SPSS employing chi-square tests and logistic regression
  • 83.0% of participants perceived the Anatomage Table as beneficial for their learning
  • Female sex (AOR = 3.51, CI: 1.26-9.76) and good practice (AOR = 3.05, CI: 1.26-7.36) were significant predictors of perceived benefits
  • 65.9% reported improved learning due to the Anatomage Table

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gross anatomy is foundational in medical education and is traditionally taught through cadaveric dissection. However, post-COVID-19 technological advancements have introduced digital tools, such as the anatomage table (AT), which offers interactive 3D virtual dissection to enhance learning outcomes and overcome logistical challenges. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the perceived educational benefits of AT and associated factors among medical students at the University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), Rwanda. METHODS: A cross-sectional analytical study using a structured, validated questionnaire was conducted among 148 first- to third-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery students. Data were collected using the KoboToolbox and analyzed using SPSS. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with perceived educational benefits of AT. A p-value < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 135 participating medical students (response rate of 91.2%), 83.0% perceived AT as beneficial, while 83.7% demonstrated good practice and a favorable attitude toward its use. Additionally, 65.9% of the participants reported improved learning due to the use of AT. Logistic regression identified female sex (AOR = 3.51, CI: 1.26-9.76), good practice (AOR = 3.05, CI: 1.26-7.36), and perceived learning improvement (AOR = 4.45, CI: 2.26-9.13) as significant predictors of perceived benefits. CONCLUSION: This study shows that students perceived AT as a beneficial educational tool for learning gross anatomy and associated it with a positive attitude and improved learning experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muche et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3a6dee9eb8c0dce51a5https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09569-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cultural practices of the Zulu ethnic group on the body and their influence on body donation2020 · 43 citations
  2. 2Analysis of immediate student outcomes following a change in gross anatomy laboratory teaching methodology*2018 · 30 citations
  3. 3The additional role of virtual to traditional dissection in teaching anatomy: a randomised controlled trial2020 · 72 citations
  4. 4Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: new normal in anatomy education2022 · 110 citations
  5. 5Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era2015 · 388 citations