PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Solar0 citationsOpen Access

A Hybrid 1D-CNN–LSTM–MHA Model for Short-Term Probabilistic Photovoltaic Power Forecasting

View Full Paper
ESErhan Sur

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop and evaluate a hybrid model for short-term photovoltaic power forecasting that improves prediction accuracy.
  • Developed a hybrid model combining 1D-CNN, LSTM, and MHA for forecasting.
  • Evaluated model performance over a 300-day dataset at 15 min and 60 min forecast horizons.
  • Used quantile regression with pinball loss for generating probabilistic prediction intervals.
  • 1D-CNN-LSTM-MHA model achieved R2 = 0.9370 and nRMSE = 7.13% at H1 horizon.
  • At H4 horizon, model achieved R2 = 0.9327 and nRMSE = 7.37%.
  • Statistically significant performance differences compared to LSTM in DM-MAE, DM-RMSE, Clark-West, and Fisher-Z tests.

Abstract

The intermittent nature of photovoltaic power generation makes short-term forecasting critical for grid management. In this study, a hybrid model combining a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and multi-head attention (MHA) mechanism was developed and evaluated on a 300-day dataset at 15 min (H1) and 60 min (H4) forecast horizons. The model generates prediction intervals with 80% nominal coverage using a quantile regression approach trained with the pinball loss function. The hyperparameters were determined through Optuna-based Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) optimisation. The LSTM, 1D-CNN-LSTM, LSTM-MHA, and 1D-CNN-LSTM-MHA models were compared under the same experimental setting. The 1D-CNN-LSTM-MHA model achieved the best deterministic performance at both forecast horizons. At the H1 horizon, R2 = 0.9370 and nRMSE = 7.13% were obtained, whereas at the H4 horizon, R2 = 0.9327 and nRMSE = 7.37% were achieved. In the probabilistic evaluation, this model produced the lowest PINAW and Winkler score values. In the statistical comparison, the performance differences in the 1D-CNN-LSTM-MHA model relative to the LSTM reference model were statistically significant in the DM-MAE, DM-RMSE, Clark–West, and Fisher-Z tests at both horizons. The statistical results indicate that the contribution of the attention mechanism becomes more evident when combined with the convolutional component, whereas adding attention alone to the LSTM did not produce a statistically significant improvement. This study provides a comparative evaluation framework for short-term PV active power forecasting by combining probabilistic forecasting through quantile regression with statistical model comparison.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erhan Sur (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc42cdee9eb8c0dce5c12https://doi.org/10.3390/solar6030030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper