PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Services and Program Development at the LGBTQ+ Student Life Office at an Elite Private University in the Midwest of the United States

GLG Y Liu

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess the LGBTQ+ Student Life Office's services and programming effectiveness at a private university.
  • Employed CAS and CPI evaluation frameworks
  • Conducted comparative analysis with five peer institutions
  • Proposed future event ideas and student feedback surveys for service evaluation.
  • The center shows strong performance in providing inclusive programming and supportive environments.
  • Identified gaps include low online event visibility and disconnection from LGBTQ+ alumni network.
  • Recommendations include a career fair with the business school and improved feedback mechanisms.

Abstract

This study evaluates the services and programming of the LGBTQ+ Student Life Office at a prestigious private university in the Midwest United States. Employing two established evaluation frameworks—the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) and the Campus Pride Index (CPI)—the research provides a comprehensive assessment of the center's operational effectiveness, with a focus on ally training, Safe Space and Safe Zone initiatives, counseling and health services, event frequency and quality, and user experience. Comparative analysis with five peer institutions further contextualized the center's strengths and highlighted opportunities for growth. Findings indicate that the center performs strongly in most categories, particularly in delivering inclusive programming and fostering a supportive environment. However, limitations such as insufficient online event visibility and the disconnection from the formal LGBTQ+ alumni network were identified. To address these gaps, we proposed a future event idea—a career fair in partnership with the business school—and a structured student feedback survey for long-term service evaluation. This project not only contributes to institutional improvement but also offers a replicable model for evaluating and enhancing LGBTQ+ services across higher education settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

G Y Liu (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc42cdee9eb8c0dce5c9bhttps://doi.org/10.6082/m1y21-pxp69
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A beacon of inclusion for our whole community: Examining a civic university through the lens of LGBTQ + inclusion2026
  2. 2‘I have gained insight, direction, affirmation, and a network’. Examining the impact of the UK's first LGBTQ+ specific leadership development programme in higher education2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Assessing Progress: An Integrated Review of LGBTQ+ Faculty Experiences in Higher Education 2010–20252026
  4. 4Strategies to develop an LGBTQIA+-inclusive adolescent sexual health program evaluation2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5An Evaluation of a Multi-Level LGBTQ Bystander Intervention for College Athletics: A Pilot Study2025