PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Trade-offs, synergies and scale effects of ecosystem services in the middle reaches of the Yellow River

HZHao-xuan ZhangWXWen-jing XuMXMeng-hao Xi

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the interactions among ecosystem services and their dynamic changes over two decades in the middle reaches of the Yellow River.
  • Utilized InVEST and RUSLE models with 5 km × 5 km and 10 km × 10 km grid cells and county analysis units.
  • Analyzed grain production, water yield, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration from 2000 to 2020.
  • Developed a multi-scale framework for assessing trade-off/synergy relationships.
  • Grain production, water yield, and soil conservation increased overall, while carbon storage slightly declined.
  • Dynamic analysis showed positive synergies dominating from 2000-2010, with notable trade-offs from 2010-2020, especially at the county scale.
  • A hierarchical driving mechanism was identified, influenced by micro, meso, and macro factors affecting ecosystem services.

Abstract

Based on the InVEST and RUSLE models, and using 5 km × 5 km and 10 km × 10 km grid cells as well as counties as analysis units, this study assessed grain production, water yield, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration services in the middle reaches of the Yellow River (MRYR) in 2000, 2010, and 2020, and analyzed their spatiotemporal changes and trade-off/synergy relationships from both static and dynamic perspectives. From 2000 to 2020, grain production, water yield and soil conservation in the MRYR increased overall with distinct spatial differentiation, while carbon storage remained basically stable with a slight decline. Significant static trade-offs/synergies existed among ecosystem service (ES) bundles with temporal evolution characteristics, and their interaction intensity presented clear scale dependence with typical threshold effects. Dynamically, positive synergies dominated all ES pairs during 2000–2010, whereas trade-offs/negative synergies expanded significantly during 2010–2020, especially at the county scale. This study further reveals the hierarchical driving mechanism of ES trade-off/synergy spatial pattern: fine-scale fragmentation is driven by micro-topographic and local management factors, meso-scale integration by regional ecological and agricultural configuration, and county-level differentiation by macro-policy and socio-economic drivers. Beyond the traditional correlation-based analysis framework, we propose a multi-scale coupling analysis framework of ES trade-off/synergy that integrates static correlation, dynamic difference and hierarchical driving mechanism, and clarify the emergent system behavior of ES interactions (non-linear change of interaction intensity with scale expansion). This framework breaks the single-scale and pure statistical analysis paradigm of existing studies, enriches the scale effect theory of ES, and provides a new theoretical perspective and methodological reference for the coordinated regulation of ES in ecologically fragile areas with intense human-environment conflicts worldwide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc509dee9eb8c0dce6778https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48721-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper