PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

The One-Dimensional Moisture Transport Model for Concrete Under Dry–Wet Cycles

View Full Paper
YCYanjuan ChenLTLuping TangJGJianming Gao

Key Points

  • To develop a model that predicts one-dimensional moisture transport in concrete during dry-wet cycles.
  • Derived governing equations for weight loss and gain during drying and wetting phases.
  • Utilized evaporation tests to determine the diffusion coefficient and a modified sorptivity approach for the wetting phase.
  • Conducted experimental validation on concrete samples with varying water-to-cement ratios.
  • Model maintained relative errors below 10% for standard concrete mixes regarding moisture transport predictions.
  • Higher-porosity samples showed greater variability due to complex pore structures affecting moisture retention.
  • Captured cumulative moisture trends effectively across several dry-wet cycles.

Abstract

This study proposes a novel analytical model to predict one-dimensional moisture transport in concrete under cyclic drying and wetting conditions. The framework distinguishes between two physical mechanisms: diffusion-driven evaporation during drying and capillary-driven suction during wetting. Governing equations for weight loss and gain are derived for each respective phase. During the drying phase, weight loss follows a linear relationship with the square root of time, allowing the diffusion coefficient to be determined via evaporation tests. For the wetting phase, a modified sorptivity approach is employed, incorporating an error-function baseline to account for residual moisture. A calibration coefficient of ε is utilized to correct for varying conditions between standard water suction tests and environmental wetting, particularly for air-entrained concrete characterized by larger capillary volumes and complex tortuosity. Experimental validation was conducted on concrete with varying water-to-cement ratios. The model demonstrated excellent agreement with experimental data, maintaining relative errors below 10% for standard mixes. While higher-porosity samples exhibited greater scatter due to “water traps” and complex pore structures, the model effectively captured cumulative moisture trends over multiple cycles. This framework provides a robust tool for assessing the durability of concrete structures in unsheltered environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc64adee9eb8c0dce7721https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112204
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper