Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose The proliferation of mobile technologies has transformed language learning in distance education, positioning mobile apps as essential tools for remote and self-directed learners worldwide. This paper presents an evaluation of the feature quality of mobile language learning apps (MLLAs), showing how design, content and pedagogical features of widely used MLLAs can be systematically analysed and compared. Design/methodology/approach Eight widely used MLLAs – Duolingo, Memrise, Busuu, Falou, LingoDeer, Beelinguapp, FunEasyLearn and Innovative Language Learning – were evaluated using a structured framework. The framework encompasses four dimensions: app background, design, content and pedagogy. Findings The evaluation results highlight the strengths and limitations of each app, as well as the interplay between design, content and pedagogy in supporting learning processes. The results reveal notable disparities in app performance. Busuu emerged as the top-performing app, particularly in content quality and pedagogical features. Beelinguapp showed limited interactivity and applicability. Duolingo, despite its popularity and innovative gamification elements, had shortcomings in content and pedagogy. Originality/value This study advances mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) research by situating MLLA evaluation within the context of distance education. It offers a practical, objective and replicable feature-evaluation methodology for selecting apps that align with learner needs and objectives. The results also contribute empirical evidence on app quality disparities, supporting evidence-based tool selection for language learning.
Sun et al. (Tue,) studied this question.