PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

CFM-Net with Multi-Scale Attention and Adaptive Fusion for Robust UAV-Based Bridge Crack Segmentation

View Full Paper
FWFeng WangJHJiadong HeXCXinghua Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve crack detection accuracy during UAV inspections by proposing a novel segmentation network, CFM-Net.
  • Constructed an optimized U-Net backbone for model design.
  • Integrated three dedicated modules: Channel-Spatial Attention for feature amplification, Gated Fusion for multi-level feature fusion, and Morphology-Guided Multi-Scale Structural Perception for structural modeling.
  • Evaluated the model on the Mix Bridge Crack dataset for performance comparison with existing methods.
  • Achieved 80.05% mIoU and 87.06% F1-score, outperforming DeepCrack and CrackFormer in both metrics.
  • Improved detection of fine, narrow cracks, and reduced false positives significantly on heterogeneous datasets.

Abstract

To enhance crack detection accuracy during UAV-based inspections and address key challenges such as false positives from complex backgrounds, missed narrow cracks, and insufficient structural continuity modeling, this study proposes CFM-Net, a task-oriented segmentation network integrating Channel-Spatial Attention and Multi-Scale Structural Enhancement. Constructed on an optimized U-Net backbone, it employs three dedicated modules: the Channel and Spatial Attention Module (CBAM) to amplify crack-related features and suppress background interference; the Gated Fusion Module (GFF) to dynamically fuse multi-level features, improving detection of fine, narrow cracks; and the Morphology-Guided Multi-Scale Structural Perception Module (MGMSIB), designed to model the structural continuity and multi-scale characteristics of cracks. Comprehensive evaluations on the Mix Bridge Crack dataset demonstrate CFM-Net achieves competitive performance among the evaluated methods, with an mIoU of 80.05% and an F1-score of 87.06%. This represents a significant improvement over strong baselines, outperforming DeepCrack and CrackFormer by 2.3% and 2.42% in mIoU, and 1.21% and 1.03% in F1-score, respectively. Furthermore, the model demonstrates robust performance on heterogeneous crack datasets composed of multiple public sources, particularly in reducing false alarms, recovering narrow cracks, and maintaining crack topology. These results conclusively validate the effectiveness and practical utility of the proposed method for automated bridge crack inspection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211611d499ed480b16f2a3https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115420
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper