Residential and Transplant Center Neighborhood Segregation and Live Donor Liver Transplant

Importance: Neighborhood segregation, a mechanism of structural racism, is associated with racial and ethnic disparities in health care access and outcomes. Live donor liver transplant (LDLT) is the ideal treatment for cirrhosis, improving survival and quality of life. Understanding the role of segregation in LDLT access is important to address disparities. Objective: To assess the associations between residential and transplant center neighborhood segregation and LDLT access. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from a US national transplant registry on adult candidates (age ≥18 years) for first-time liver transplant between February 1, 2016, and June 30, 2025, at centers that performed 1 or more LDLT annually during that time. Exposure: Residential and transplant center neighborhood segregation, measured using the Thiel H method at the zip code tabulation area level and dichotomized at the respective median values. Main Outcomes and Measures: A Cox proportional hazards regression model quantified the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of LDLT and included interactions with race and ethnicity and insurance. LDLT access within high-segregation residential neighborhoods by racial and ethnic composition (predominantly White or predominantly racial and ethnic minoritized population) was also quantified. Results: Among 22 223 adult liver transplant candidates, mean (SD) age was 55.3 (11.2) years, 13 518 (60.8%) were male, 1476 (6.6%) were Black, 5097 (22.9%) were Hispanic or Latino, and 15 650 (70.4%) were White. Most (11 669 52.5%) had private insurance. After adjustment, candidates residing in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access (AHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.88). Hispanic or Latino candidates in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access than their counterparts in low-segregation neighborhoods (AHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72; P < .001 for interaction), but associations between neighborhood segregation and LDLT did not vary significantly by insurance type (P = .52 for interaction). Candidates wait-listed at transplant centers in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access (AHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.70). Candidates with Medicare or Medicaid wait-listed at centers in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access than their counterparts in low-segregation neighborhoods (AHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.51; P < .001 for interaction). Within high-segregation residential neighborhoods, candidates in neighborhoods with a larger racial and ethnic population had lower likelihood of LDLT access than those living in neighborhoods with a larger White population (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78). Conclusion and Relevance: In this national cohort study, living in or being wait-listed at centers in high-segregation neighborhoods was associated with lower likelihood of LDLT access and candidates living in high-segregation neighborhoods with a larger racial and ethnic minority population compared with a larger White population had lower likelihood of LDLT. Investing in high-segregation neighborhoods to address these structural disadvantages may help improve equity in LDLT access.