PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Clinical Oral Implants Research0 citations

Marginal Bone Loss Around Bone‐Level Fully Guided Implants With Direct Implant Connection Versus Intermediate Abutment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
JGJordi Gargallo‐AlbiolMZMaría José Zilleruelo-PozoATAnna Treserra‐Parra

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how an intermediate prosthetic abutment affects peri-implant marginal bone loss around two implant-supported restorations in the posterior area.
  • Randomized clinical trial with 30 patients requiring two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible.
  • Participants were divided into Control group (direct connection) and Test group (intermediate abutment), then further subdivided by abutment height.
  • Marginal bone loss was measured using periapical x-ray imaging at multiple time points post-surgery.
  • The Test group showed lower marginal bone loss (0.83 ± 0.25 mm) compared to the Control group (1.17 ± 0.35 mm; p = 0.001).
  • No significant difference was observed in marginal bone loss between the two abutment height subgroups, although there was a trend favoring the higher abutment.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of an intermediate prosthetic abutment on peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) around two implant-supported fixed restorations in the posterior area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included patients with partial edentulism requiring two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible. All implants were bone-level tapered implants, placed through a fully guided approach and finalized with a CAD/CAM temporary and final full zirconia restoration. The total sample comprised 30 patients (60 implants), divided into a Control group (direct to implant connection, non-intermediate abutment; 12 patients, 24 implants) and a Test group (intermediate abutment; 18 patients, 36 implants). The Test group was further divided into two abutment height subgroups: 1 mm (7 patients) and 2.5 mm (11 patients). MBL was measured using periapical x-ray imaging on the day of surgery, at definitive crown delivery, and at 4, 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS: The Test group (intermediate abutment) had lower MBL (0.83 ± 0.25 mm) than the Control group (1.17 ± 0.35 mm; p = 0.001). The secondary analysis of the abutment height subgroups did not differ significantly in MBL, although values showed a trend towards a more favorable for the highest intermediate abutment. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that direct implant connection prosthesis induced greater MBL around implants in splinted crowns for an implant-supported fixed restoration when compared with the use of an intermediate abutment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06017115.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gargallo‐Albiol et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2116acd499ed480b16f93bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70141
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper