In January 1913, S. Ramanujan, a clerk in Madras with no university degree, mailed handwritten mathematics to three Cambridge professors: H.F. Baker, E.W. Hobson, and G.H. Hardy. Two did not engage; one nearly dismissed the work before reversing. Why did Ramanujan act, given the near-certainty of rejection? This paper tests that question using the Heustoc Framework, defined in Agrawal 2026a. Heustoc proposes that researchers submit work when two simple conditions hold: (1) the harm of waiting is speeding up, and (2) waiting is riskier than acting.
Rajesh Agrawal (2026) studied this question.