PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Risk Analysis0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Application of a Novel Dose–Response Model for the Quantification of Clostridioides difficile Infection Risks

View Full Paper
EPElizabeth N. PaddyMSM. SohailOAOluwasola O.D. Afolabi

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a dose-response model for Clostridioides difficile to improve risk management strategies.
  • Developed using murine-derived data closely mirroring human CDI.
  • Evaluated using maximum likelihood estimation in R and compared with established models.
  • Assessed using sensitivity analysis and criteria such as Akaike and Bayesian information criteria.
  • Identified beta-Poisson model as the best fit with α = 0.56 and N50 = 2871.56.
  • Estimated doses for 10% and 50% infection rates were 505 and 3994 CFU, respectively.
  • Estimated 33 CDI cases per 100,000 healthcare workers from bed rail contact and 12 from keyboards.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The lack of a dose–response model for Clostridioides difficile , attributed to insufficient human data, challenges effective C. difficile infection (CDI) risk management. This study presents a novel murine‐derived dose–response model for C. difficile , developed from experimental data that closely mirrors human CDI, advancing the field of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and the strategic management of this pathogen. Animal dose–response datasets for C. difficile were evaluated against established criteria, and a mouse model of C. difficile ‐associated colitis that mirrors critical aspects of CDI in human beings was selected as the most appropriate dataset for analysis. Using maximum likelihood estimation in R, these data were fitted to the beta‐Poisson and exponential models and assessed through Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, likelihood tests, and a sensitivity analysis. The beta‐Poisson model was identified as the best fit ( α = 0.56 and N 50 = 2871.56) with estimated mean doses for 10% and 50% infection rates of 505 and 3994 CFU, respectively. This model was then applied in a QMRA framework to assess CDI risk associated with commonly encountered clinical surfaces based on published surface contamination data and healthcare worker contact rates. Annual risk estimates from the model's application suggest that, out of every 100,000 healthcare workers exposed in clinical settings, approximately 33 CDI cases could result from contact with bed rails, 12 from computer keyboards, and fewer than 1 from door handles. By providing a formally derived dose–response relationship for C. difficile , this study offers a starting point for future QMRA research on this pathogen and supports the development of more detailed, context‐specific risk assessments for C. difficile .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paddy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211743d499ed480b1701bfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70260
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting clinical trial success for Clostridium difficile infections based on preclinical data2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Fractional Poisson—A Simple Dose‐Response Model for Human Norovirus2014 · 123 citations
  3. 3Development of a dose-response relationship for Escherichia coli O157:H72000 · 132 citations
  4. 4Clostridium difficile Infection2010 · 135 citations
  5. 5Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).2012 · 2,008 citations