PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics0 citationsOpen Access

ABCD-GENE Score and Bleeding in Post-PCI Patients: Implications for Guided De-Escalation of Antiplatelet Therapy

View Full Paper
JCJames C. CoonsKPKathleen PolkowskiLPLinda Prebehalla

Key Result

A low ABCD-GENE score (<10) was associated with less bleeding compared to a high score (P=0.008), but was not independently associated with bleeding in multivariable analysis.

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the relationship between the ABCD-GENE score and bleeding risks in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of PCI patients with CYP2C19 genotyping.
  • Primary outcome assessed was time to first bleed within 1 year; secondary outcomes included time to major bleed and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
  • Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Among the 2547 patients, those with a low ABCD-GENE score had significantly lower rates of any bleeding (P=0.008) and major bleeding (P=0.015) compared to those with a high score.
  • In the low score group, clopidogrel was associated with lower any bleeding (P<.001) and major bleeding (P=0.022) than prasugrel or ticagrelor.
  • ABCD-GENE score was not independently associated with bleeding after considering other variables.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,547)

Structured PICO

Does prasugrel or ticagrelor increase bleeding compared to clopidogrel in post-PCI patients stratified by ABCD-GENE score?

P
Population
2,547 patients who underwent PCI and CYP2C19 genotyping, followed for 1 year to assess bleeding risk.
E
Exposure
Prasugrel or ticagrelor
C
Comparator
Clopidogrel
O
Outcome
Time to first bleed of any severity within 1 yearsafety

In post-PCI patients with a low ABCD-GENE score, clopidogrel is associated with less bleeding compared to prasugrel or ticagrelor without a difference in MACE, supporting its potential use for guided de-escalation.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.008

Abstract

Background The ABCD-GENE (Age, Body Mass Index, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Genotyping) score is a tool used to identify increased thrombotic risk in clopidogrel-treated patients. We evaluated the association between a low ABCD-GENE score (<10) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding among prasugrel or ticagrelor and clopidogrel-treated patients. Methods This was an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CYP2C19 genotyping. The primary outcome was time to first bleed of any severity within 1 year. Time to first major bleed, defined by BARC 3a, 3b, 3c, or 5 criteria, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were secondary outcomes. BARC bleeding events were compared between prasugrel or ticagrelor and clopidogrel-treated patients and stratified by the ABCD-GENE score threshold of ≥10. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used for time-to-event analyses. Results Of 2547 patients, 1760 were in the low score group, and 787 were in the high score group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that any bleeding ( P = .008) and major bleeding ( P = .015) were less for those with a low score compared to a high score. Among those in the low score group, any bleeding ( P < .001) and major bleeding ( P = .022) were lower with clopidogrel versus prasugrel or ticagrelor. However, the ABCD-GENE score was not independently associated with bleeding in the Cox model. No difference in MACE was observed by treatment in the low score group. Conclusions The ABCD-GENE score was associated with BARC bleeding, yet other variables had a greater impact such as history of GI bleed, anticoagulation, P2Y12 inhibitor, and age. Patients with a low score who received prasugrel or ticagrelor had more bleeding versus clopidogrel. Our findings support further evaluation of the ABCD-GENE score as a tool for guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation post-PCI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coons et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-PCI (n=2,547). Low ABCD-GENE score (<10) vs. High ABCD-GENE score (≥10) was evaluated on Time to first bleed of any severity within 1 year (p=0.008). A low ABCD-GENE score (<10) was associated with less bleeding compared to a high score (P=0.008), but was not independently associated with bleeding in multivariable analysis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211780d499ed480b17049ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/10742484261457268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper