PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Environmental Geochemistry and Health0 citationsOpen Access

Integrated framework assessment of water reuse feasibility in mining

JLJoão Pedro Machado de LimaSLSonaly Cristina Rezende Borges de LimaMAMíriam Cristina Santos Amaral

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a comprehensive framework to assess the feasibility of treated wastewater reuse in mining operations.
  • Proposes an integrated assessment framework that includes regulatory, technical, and economic factors.
  • Utilizes a 'veto logic' to avoid oversimplified evaluations.
  • Applies the framework using real water quality data to compare municipal wastewater reuse with acid mine drainage recycling.
  • Feasibility is context-dependent; external municipal wastewater sources often show higher feasibility than internal recycling.
  • Treated municipal wastewater typically has lower mineralization and offers more regulatory stability.
  • Classifies reuse scenarios into four categories: Fully Feasible, Conditionally Feasible, Economically Constrained, and Structurally Unfeasible.

Abstract

Water scarcity, increasing regulatory pressure, and growing societal demands for sustainable resource management have intensified the need for alternative water sources in the mining sector. Treated municipal wastewater represents a potentially viable option; however, its implementation remains constrained by fragmented regulatory frameworks, technical uncertainties, and economic limitations. This study proposes an integrated assessment framework to evaluate the feasibility of treated wastewater reuse in mining operations through a structured approach that operationalizes regulatory alignment, technical compatibility with mineral processing circuits, and economic viability. Unlike conventional binary assessments, this framework introduces a 'veto logic' within a tridimensional feasibility space, ensuring that critical technical or legal barriers are not overlooked by simple mathematical averaging. Based on normalized indicators, reuse scenarios are classified into four outcome categories: Fully Feasible, Conditionally Feasible, Economically Constrained, and Structurally Unfeasible. The framework's utility is demonstrated through a proof-of-concept application using real water quality data, contrasting municipal wastewater reuse against internal acid mine drainage recycling. The results demonstrate that feasibility is highly context-dependent, with external municipal sources often outperforming internal recycling due to lower mineralization and higher regulatory stability. This study contributes a reproducible methodological tool for resilient water management, supporting the reduction of freshwater abstraction and alignment with global sustainability objectives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211781d499ed480b17064fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03244-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper