PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

The Mediating Role of Inattentional Blindness Between Risk Propensity and Risk Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study in Confined Spaces

View Full Paper
PYPeilun YuYJYongqing Jiang

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how individual differences in risk propensity affect risk perception through inattentional blindness.
  • Utilized psychological scales and eye-tracking technology to analyze visual search behaviors.
  • Examined participants with varying risk propensities in confined space hazard scenarios.
  • Quantitatively assessed Time to First Fixation (TFF) and Fixation Count (FC) in critical areas.
  • Individuals with high risk propensity exhibited delayed TFF and lower FC in critical hazard areas.
  • Inattentional blindness fully mediated the relationship between risk propensity and perception performance, accounting for 72.56% of failures.
  • An imbalance in attentional resource allocation resulted in higher cognitive omission of hazards among high-risk individuals.

Abstract

Confined space operations are characterized by environmental complexity and latent hazards, where failures in human risk perception represent a primary precursor to industrial accidents, posing a significant challenge to sustainable occupational health and safety (OHS) management. This study investigates the mechanism by which individual traits (risk propensity) influence risk perception performance through cognitive processes (inattentional blindness). Utilizing psychological scales and eye-tracking technology, we quantitatively analyzed the visual search behaviors of participants with varying risk propensities across typical confined space hazard scenarios. The results indicate that individuals with high risk propensity tend to adopt a “random-exploratory superficial scanning strategy,” characterized by significantly delayed Time to First Fixation (TFF) and lower Fixation Count (FC) within critical hazard areas compared to the low-risk propensity group. Statistical analysis reveals that inattentional blindness exerts a full mediating effect between risk propensity and risk perception performance, accounting for 72.56% of perception failures. This research confirms that an imbalance in attentional resource allocation leads to higher cognitive omission of salient hazards among high-risk propensity individuals. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for cognitive reliability assessment and the design of sustainable safety training programs in high-risk industries, ultimately contributing to the social sustainability and well-being of industrial workforces.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117bfd499ed480b1709f6https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115498
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Influence of Personality Traits on Hazard Recognition in Construction Workers2026
  2. 2Emotional and cognitive mechanisms in hazard prediction and orienting skills: evidence from physiological and eye-tracking measures2026
  3. 3Why do Workers Generate Biased Risk Perceptions? An Analysis of Anchoring Effects and Influential Factors in Workers' Assessment of Unsafe Behavior2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Exploring construction workers' attention and awareness in diverse virtual hazard scenarios to prevent struck-by accidents2024 · 21 citations
  5. 5A systematic review of eye-tracking in construction hazard recognition and risk assessment2026