Modern brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and neuroprosthetics have achieved remarkable engineering successes in decoding motor intentions from neural activity. Yet the field confronts a fundamental theoretical barrier: current systems are pattern classifiers that can detect *what* a user intends but not *why* an action is intended, *how strongly* it is desired, or *whether* the user experiences the prosthetic as part of themselves. We argue that this barrier stems from the absence of a *model of the subject* in the design loop. We present a mathematical framework based on Titov's subject-centred model (2023) that fills this gap. The subject is described as the dynamic interaction of two subsystems — the *intentional* (I, memory and meanings) and the *intending* (D, drives and motives) — whose coupling through a *reentry loop* generates emotions, significance, and the sense of "I. " We define a *subject-authentic interface* as one for which the integrated information Φ (S ∪ J) > Φ (S), i. e. , the interface becomes part of the subject. We derive the operator formalism in detail, propose a concrete neural-network architecture (with full PyTorch specifications) for a BCI with artificial reentry, provide the computable ΦG-criterion of Barrett & Seth (2011) as the training objective, and formulate three falsifiable experimental predictions. A Lean 4 proof sketch establishes that reentry implies Φ > 0 under the Gaussian approximation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuri N. Berdinsky
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuri N. Berdinsky (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117dfd499ed480b170c2d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20513201