PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

PRECISE Version 2: Essential Tips for Prostate Cancer Monitoring Using MRI.

View Full Paper
AOArthur OgataGBGiorgio BrembillaADAdriano B Dias

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance prostate cancer monitoring through updated MRI evaluation criteria.
  • Overview of PRECISE version 2 criteria for MRI evaluations.
  • Utilization of a 1-5 Likert scoring system for assessing MRI changes.
  • Integration of clinical findings with MRI assessments to guide active surveillance.
  • Improved risk stratification and better identification of clinically significant disease using MRI.
  • Simplified guidelines for evaluating longitudinal MRI changes in prostate lesions.
  • Enhanced communication standards between radiologists and clinicians through structured reporting.

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly adopted strategy for men with low-risk or selected favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and is aimed at avoiding overtreatment while maintaining close monitoring. MRI has been integrated into AS protocols to help improve risk stratification, identify clinically significant disease, and guide targeted biopsies. During AS, MRI is integral to assessing the stability or interval progression of imaging findings. It can also allow identification of new lesions, potentially prompting a reassessment of treatment strategies. The PRECISE (Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation) criteria, recently updated to version 2, offer a structured reporting system for serial MRI evaluations during AS. PRECISE version 2 introduced simplified guidelines for assessing longitudinal changes in MRI examination of the prostate, which focus on lesion size, appearance, and the development of new lesions. It involves a 1-5 Likert scoring system to categorize the likelihood of changes at MRI over time to standardize communication between radiologists and clinicians. The authors provide an overview of the rationale and criteria for patient selection for an AS protocol, review the foundations and evolution of the PRECISE system, and demonstrate how to integrate clinical and MRI findings, including a series of practical cases. ©RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ogata et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211852d499ed480b170e40https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.130710
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Standardizing Prostate MRI Reporting in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Framework2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2MRI for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: How I Do It2026 · 4 citations
  3. 3PRECISE Version 2: Updated Recommendations for Reporting Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer2024 · 71 citations
  4. 4Multicentre validation of the PRECISE scoring system for prostate MRI during active surveillance2026 · 4 citations
  5. 5The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the active surveillance of prostate cancer: state of the art2026 · 1 citations