PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Amenity Supply and Sustainable Underground-Space Vitality in a High-Density Commercial Interchange Hub: Evidence from Licun Station, Qingdao

View Full Paper
JZJin ZhaoHWH WangHLHaoqi Li

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand how different types of amenities influence underground-space vitality in a bustling urban hub.
  • Developed an amenity evaluation system based on 426 valid questionnaire responses.
  • Used the entropy weight method to assess amenity indicators' perceptual differentiation.
  • Applied PLS-SEM to analyze the relationship between amenity supply, user behavior, and underground-space vitality.
  • Natural-environment amenities showed the highest perceptual differentiation.
  • Facility-and-service amenities significantly influenced user behavior leading to enhanced underground-space vitality.
  • Consumption-experience amenities increased visit duration and satisfaction but decreased social interaction.

Abstract

High-density commercial interchange hubs are important components of transit-oriented urban regeneration. However, high passenger flow does not necessarily generate sustained underground-space vitality. This study examines the Licun high-density commercial interchange hub in Qingdao, China. It explores how amenity supply influences sustainable underground-space vitality through user behavioral responses. Based on 426 valid questionnaire responses, an amenity evaluation system was developed across five dimensions. These dimensions include natural-environment, facility-and-service, consumption-experience, socio-cultural, and transport-connection amenities. The entropy weight method was used to identify the perceptual differentiation of amenity indicators. PLS-SEM was then applied to examine the pathway of “amenity supply–user behavioral response–underground-space vitality.” The results show that natural-environment amenities present the strongest perceptual differentiation, while facility-and-service amenities play a fundamental role in supporting user behavioral responses. Consumption-experience amenities promote visit choice, stay duration, and satisfaction, but may weaken interaction and participation, indicating a potential tension between commercial vitality and public interaction. Transport-connection amenities mainly affect visit choice rather than sustained use. Among user behaviors, stay duration, interaction and participation, and satisfaction feedback are positively associated with underground-space vitality, whereas simple visit choice is not. These findings suggest that sustainable vitality in a high-density commercial interchange hub should not be understood as passenger volume alone. It should be understood as the transformation of transit flow into voluntary stay, interaction, satisfaction, and repeated use. This study contextualizes amenity theory in a high-density commercial interchange hub. It also offers planning implications for underground-space regeneration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a211852d499ed480b170e55https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115614
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper