Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus, 1758) is considered one of the major pests affecting global pome fruit production due to its wide distribution, cryptic feeding habit, high economic impact, and continuous evolution of insecticide resistance. Historically, management of this species has relied on repeated pesticide applications, which have been associated with environmental impacts, occupational exposure, pesticide residues in food, and compromised sustainability of pesticide-dependent agricultural systems, reinforcing the relevance of integrated One Health approaches. This narrative review analyzed global management strategies for C. pomonella published between 2014 and 2024 and indexed in the Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The reviewed studies demonstrate a gradual transition from predominantly chemical-based programs toward integrated strategies involving pheromone-based monitoring, mating disruption, biological control, and preventive plant biosecurity measures. Behavioral and biological approaches showed potential to reduce dependence on recurrent insecticide applications, particularly when associated with phytosanitary surveillance and integrated pest management programs. However, the effectiveness of these approaches remains influenced by insecticide resistance, climatic variability, and local ecological conditions. The evidence also suggests that the impacts of C. pomonella management are not limited to phytosanitary protection, involving interactions related to environmental sustainability, food safety, and human exposure to pesticides. Despite the relevance of the One Health approach, its operational incorporation into agricultural pest management remains limited, especially regarding the integration of research conducted under the One Health perspective. In this context, the sustainable management of Cydia pomonella requires integrated strategies capable of connecting phytosanitary surveillance, preventive plant biosecurity, and agricultural and ecological sustainability in order to ensure food security and population health.
Vieira et al. (2026) studied this question.