PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026European Journal of Radiology0 citationsOpen Access

Predictive value of myocardial extracellular volume fraction for mortality and heart failure in known or suspected coronary artery disease patients

View Full Paper
RKRungroj KrittayaphongKJKanchalaporn JirataipornAYAhthit Yindeengam

Key Result

Extracellular volume fraction was a significant predictor of the composite outcome of mortality and heart failure (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.32-3.00; P<0.001) in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,214)

Structured PICO

Does myocardial extracellular volume fraction measured by CMR predict mortality and heart failure in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?

P
Population
2,214 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CMR, followed for a mean of 41.2 months.
E
Exposure
Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) fraction measurement by CMR (ECV above median 28.23%)
C
Comparator
ECV below median (28.23%)
O
Outcome
Mortality and heart failure onsethard clinical

Myocardial extracellular volume fraction measured by CMR is a significant independent predictor of mortality and incident heart failure in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.99 (95% CI 1.32–3)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

AbstractBackground Extracellular volume (ECV) fraction measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an indicator of interstitial fibrosis and has demonstrated prognostic significance. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of ECV in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent CMR for clinical assessment of myocardial ischemia or viability between 2017 and 2019. Native and post-contrast T1 mapping was performed using the modified look-locker inversion protocol. Primary clinical outcomes were mortality and heart failure onset. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to analyze predictors of clinical outcomes. Results A total of 2214 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 68.7 ± 12.8 years, and 54.6% (1208 patients) were female. The mean ECV was 28.87 ± 5.17%, with a median value of 28.23% (interquartile range 25.91–31.05). Among the patients, 1107 (50%) had ECV values above the median, while 1107 (50%) had an ECV below the median. During a mean follow-up duration of 41.2 ± 13.2 months, 71 patients (3.2%) died, and 58 (2.6%) patients developed heart failure. ECV was found to be a predictor of composite outcomes, all-cause mortality, and heart failure, with adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 1.99 (1.32–3.00, P P = 0.016), and 1.94 (1.03–3.63, P = 0.041), respectively. Conclusions ECV is a valuable marker for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and may be useful for the risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krittayaphong et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in known or suspected coronary artery disease (n=2,214). Extracellular volume (ECV) fraction vs. Lower ECV was evaluated on Composite outcomes (mortality and heart failure) (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-3.00, p=<0.001). Extracellular volume fraction was a significant predictor of the composite outcome of mortality and heart failure (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.32-3.00; P<0.001) in patients with known or suspected CAD.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2176ce54156c6dda57d265https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112982
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1European cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EuroCMR) registry – multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries2013 · 274 citations
  2. 2Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis2022 · 23 citations
  3. 3Cardiac T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review2016 · 981 citations
  4. 4Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI)2016 · 1,741 citations
  5. 5The impact of clinical and population strategies on coronary heart disease mortality: an assessment of Rose’s big idea2022 · 28 citations