Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Why polyandry evolves remains a compelling evolutionary question. While numerous material benefits of polyandry have been demonstrated, there has been limited attempt to link the fitness of polyandrous females to nesting behavior. Here, we introduce the "nesting-assistance" hypothesis as a new explanation for the evolution of polyandry. We theorize that in species where females are primarily responsible for nest construction, and males display some form of nesting assistance, that mating with multiple males leads to the production of more viable nests and improved offspring survival or performance. We provide an initial test of the "nesting-assistance" hypothesis in the African gray foam-nest treefrog (Chiromantis xerampelina), a species where multiple males commonly join females to construct arboreal foam nests. Field observations revealed that individuals involved in polyandrous matings synchronize the timing of bouts of leg churning, a conspicuous reproductive behavior essential for foam-nest construction. Moreover, matings involving more males produced bigger nests that were more resistant to desiccation. Paternity analysis revealed that males involved in polyandrous matings gained a share of paternity, suggesting a direct fitness benefit from nesting assistance. Our findings support the "nesting assistance" hypothesis and provide evidence for a new yet potentially widespread benefit of polyandry.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Phillip G Byrne
University of Wollongong
Martin J. Whiting
Macquarie University
Aimee J Silla
University of Wollongong
Evolution
Australian National University
Macquarie University
University of Wollongong
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Byrne et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21ee0f8dfaed040b4e90ca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpag071
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: