Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this study, we develop and test a quantitative comparative framework that leverages Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to examine and partially bridge the gap between Street View Imagery (SVI) and User-Generated Content (UGC), enabling quantitative and spatially explicit urban perception mining in public parks. Understanding how individuals perceive urban spaces is central to inclusive urban planning. Building on Lefebvre’s spatial triad, our approach frames SVI as perceived space and UGC as lived space, integrating geo-computation and large-scale visual–textual analysis to address the modality gaps inherent to SVI. We compare SVI and UGC and assess whether MLLMs, specifically GPT-4o, can bridge the gaps between them. Empirical analysis shows that SVI captures functional, infrastructure-based attributes, while UGC highlights aesthetic and experiential dimensions of urban form and livability. These findings underscore the complementary nature of both data sources and the limitations of relying solely on SVI-based indices. By leveraging MLLMs to interpret visual and textual data within a unified framework, we demonstrate a scalable method for computational modelling of urban perception that integrates both perceived and lived space, offering new insights for data-driven planning and the optimization of urban environments.
Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.