PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Techniques in Orthopaedics0 citations

Effectiveness of Postoperative Nail Edge Fixation Following Partial Matrixectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenail

View Full Paper
AÇAli C. ÇiçekMAM. Fatih Aksay

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effect of a postoperative nail edge fixation device on clinical outcomes following partial matrixectomy for ingrown toenails.
  • Retrospective review of 110 patients treated for ingrown toenails from 2018 to 2020.
  • Comparison of outcomes between fixation device group and control group post partial matrixectomy.
  • Parameters evaluated included operative time, infection, serous exudate, erythema, healing time, and recurrence rate.
  • Mean operative time was longer in the fixation group (20.6 vs. 17.9 min, P < 0.05).
  • No significant differences in duration of postoperative erythema (P > 0.05) or serous discharge (P > 0.05).
  • Recurrence rate was 10% in the fixation group versus 19% in the control group (P > 0.05).

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a postoperative nail edge fixation device on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for ingrown toenails. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent surgical treatment for ingrown toenails between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent partial matrixectomy using curettage and electrocautery. In 1 group, an additional fixation device was applied to the operated nail, elevating the lateral and medial edges by 1 mm above the surrounding soft tissue, and was maintained for 14 days. The groups were compared in terms of operative time, infection, serous exudate, erythema, number of dressings, healing time, and recurrence rate. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, disease stage, lesion location, or follow-up duration ( P >0.05). The mean operative time was significantly longer in the fixation group (20.6 vs. 17.9 min, P 0.05), serous discharge (4.46 vs. 3.98 d, P >0.05), number of dressings required (3.87 vs. 3.57, P >0.05), total healing time (14.29 vs. 13.95 d, P >0.05), or recurrence rate (10% vs. 19%, P >0.05). Conclusion: While the use of a fixation device prolonged the operative time, it did not lead to a significant improvement in clinical outcomes such as infection, healing time, or recurrence. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to determine whether routine use of nail fixation provides clinical benefit. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Çiçek et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2268f9763171746d547732https://doi.org/10.1097/bto.0000000000000743
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper