PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026School Psychology International1 citations

A Bibliometric Analysis of School Psychology International and International Journal of School & Educational Psychology Across 45 Years: Implications for International Engagement in Producing Scholarship

View Full Paper
RFRandy G. FloydRFRyan L. FarmerMWMichelle L. Washington

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze publication trends, authorship, and citation impacts in two significant school psychology journals over 45 years.
  • Examined publication output and authorship patterns in SPI and IJSEP over 45 years.
  • Analyzed citation impact and international collaborations between the journals.
  • Compared the citation attributes of articles focusing on diverse themes, including bullying and positive psychology.
  • SPI displayed stable publication growth over the years; IJSEP peaked in 2019 before a decline.
  • Average citations were higher for SPI with predominant themes in quantitative research on bullying, while IJSEP focused on teacher experiences.
  • International representations rose notably in both journals, driven mainly by co-authorship, though historical dominance by Western regions is declining.

Abstract

This study examined publication output, authorship patterns, citation impact, and international representation across 45 years of articles published in School Psychology International (SPI) and across available years of International Journal of School & Educational Psychology (IJSEP). SPI showed a long-term, relatively stable growth trajectory in articles published per year, with modest fluctuations, whereas IJSEP exhibited a more variable pattern, peaking in articles published in 2019 before declining somewhat. Authorship became increasingly collaborative over time, with the average number of authors per article rising steadily in SPI and remaining consistently higher in IJSEP. SPI articles received higher average citations per article than IJSEP, although citation rates per year were similar across journals. Highly cited SPI articles were predominantly quantitative and focused on bullying and victimization, whereas IJSEP's highly cited articles were more often expository and focused on teacher experiences, professional issues, and student well-being. Across journals, highly cited articles frequently emphasized positive psychology, but none resulted from international collaborations. International collaboration was more prevalent in IJSEP (22.0%) than SPI (15.2%). Across journals, 81 countries were represented by first authors, with increasing international representation driven largely by co-authorship. Although authorship was historically dominated by those from Western European and North American countries, recent declines in rates of authors from these regions—particularly among first authors—suggest a shift toward broader international engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Floyd et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2268f9763171746d5477a9https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343261453524
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper