PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Assortativity in geometric and scale-free networks

View Full Paper
MKMarc KaufmannUSUlysse SchallerTBThomas Bläsius

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how assortativity influences network properties in both real-world and generative models.
  • Studied degree assortativity in real-world networks and generative models like Chung-Lu Graphs and GIRGs.
  • Analyzed various conditional and joint weight and degree distributions of connected nodes both numerically and mathematically.
  • Developed an extension of the GIRG model that displays controllable assortativity while preserving beneficial properties.
  • Confirmed that the Pearson assortativity coefficient is ineffective in measuring assortativity in heavy-tailed degree networks, with specific mathematical proof.
  • Identified that many real-world networks display assortative behavior, contrary to some generative models which are assortativity-neutral.
  • Presented a new model extension allowing for adjustable assortativity while maintaining the advantages of existing models.

Abstract

The assortative behavior of a network is the tendency of similar (or dissimilar) nodes to connect to each other. This tendency can have an influence on various properties of the network, such as its robustness or the dynamics of spreading processes. In this paper, we study degree assortativity both in real-world networks and in several generative models for networks with heavy-tailed degree distribution based on latent spaces. In particular, we study Chung-Lu Graphs and Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs (GIRGs). Previous research on assortativity has primarily focused on measuring the degree assortativity in real-world networks using the Pearson assortativity coefficient, despite reservations against this coefficient. We rigorously confirm these reservations by mathematically proving that the Pearson assortativity coefficient does not measure assortativity in any network with sufficiently heavy-tailed degree distributions, which is typical for real-world networks. Moreover, we find that other single-valued assortativity coefficients also do not sufficiently capture the wiring preferences of nodes, which often vary greatly by node degree. We therefore take a more fine-grained approach, analyzing a wide range of conditional and joint weight and degree distributions of connected nodes, both numerically in real-world networks and mathematically in the generative graph models. We provide several methods of visualizing the results. We show that the generative models are assortativity-neutral, while many real-world networks are not. Therefore, we also propose an extension of the GIRG model which retains the manifold desirable properties induced by the degree distribution and the latent space, but also exhibits tunable assortativity. We analyze the resulting model mathematically, and give a fine-grained quantification of its assortativity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaufmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22692e763171746d547ccchttps://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000193800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper