PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026European Journal of Human Genetics0 citationsOpen Access

Constitutional methylation of the MLH1 promoter: a case series including tumors not typically caused by Lynch Syndrome

View Full Paper
LGLise GraversenJAJannie AssenholtIPInge Søkilde Pedersen

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the implications of constitutional MLH1 methylation in tumors with Lynch syndrome phenotypes.
  • Presented cases of four unrelated patients from Denmark and Australia
  • Conducted immunohistochemistry and genomic analysis
  • Assessed clinical features and MLH1 promoter methylation status
  • Two patients exhibited MLH1 methylation levels indicating mosaicism
  • Clinical presentations varied and included breast cancer and dermal lipofibroma
  • Findings highlight the challenge in distinguishing these cases from classic Lynch syndrome

Abstract

Abstract Constitutional methylation of the MLH1 promoter is a rare cause of Lynch Syndrome likely to be overlooked in daily clinical practice, as MLH1 methylation is common in sporadic tumors. We present four unrelated Danish and Australian patients with Lynch syndrome phenotypes and constitutional MLH1 methylation including two patients with methylation levels indicating mosaicism. The clinical features, immunohistochemistry, MLH1 promoter methylation status and genomic analysis of probands and family members are presented. The patients varied greatly in their clinical presentation and included multiple tumors, and a breast cancer and a dermal lipofibroma, tumors not classically related to Lynch syndrome. However, these patients are difficult to distinguish from other Lynch patients based on the clinical presentation. Awareness of this rare phenomenon and systematic testing of potential carriers is paramount to detect this condition and crucial to estimate the risk of cancer and optimize care for patients and their families.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Graversen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22698b763171746d548242https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02149-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper