PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Significance of the Work "Mükemmel Tarih-I Fergana" as a Historical Source

View Full Paper
UZUlugbek Otabek ugli Ziyadullaev

Key Points

  • This article aims to evaluate the historiographical significance and narrative elements of 'Mükemmel Tarih-i Fergana' and related historical texts.
  • Examined narrative characteristics and source base of various historical works including Mufassal tavorixi Turkiston and Tarixi umm.
  • Analyzed Fozilbek's integration of written chronicles, previous historical writings, and oral traditions.
  • Evaluated the manuscript tradition and contextual influences on narrative framing.
  • Demonstrates 'Mükemmel Tarih-i Fergana' as a vital source for reconstructing the history of the Kokand Khanate.
  • Highlights Fozilbek's balanced portrayal of rulers, capturing both accolades and criticisms—a departure from solely praising histories.
  • Considers the impact of colonial conditions on the manuscript’s production and its narrative structure.

Abstract

This article examines the historiographical significance, source base, and narrative characteristics of “Mükemmel Tarih-i Fergana” and related works authored by Fozilbek Otabek oglu, with particular attention to Mufassal tavorixi Turkiston and the incomplete Tarixi umm. The study demonstrates that these works constitute important narrative sources for reconstructing the political, social, and cultural history of the Kokand Khanate and the wider Fergana Valley from the 16th to the 19th centuries. The research highlights that Fozilbek’s historiography is characterized by a synthesis of written chronicles, earlier historical works (including Ravzat us-safo, Boburnoma, and Russian historiographical materials), and oral traditions. His methodology reflects a critical, albeit contextually constrained, approach to source selection and verification, aiming to present a relatively balanced account of dynastic history. Particular emphasis is placed on his dual portrayal of rulers, in which both positive and negative attributes of khans are recorded, thereby distinguishing his work from purely panegyric historiographical traditions. The article further analyzes the manuscript tradition and textual transmission of Mukammal tarixi Fergana, preserved primarily in a later copy held at the Abu Rayhan Beruni Institute of Oriental Studies. It also considers the impact of its production under colonial administrative conditions, including its commissioning context, which may have influenced narrative framing and selection of historical events.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ulugbek Otabek ugli Ziyadullaev (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22698b763171746d548261https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20532460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper