PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

Circulating Tumor DNA and Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
NAN AegerterVPV PadoanSKS Kandala

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for treatment guidance in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating ctDNA in localized PDAC patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.
  • Included 15 studies with a total of 926 participants, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Analyzed baseline ctDNA detection rates and associations with survival outcomes using methods such as PCR and NGS for KRAS mutations.
  • Baseline ctDNA positivity was linked to poorer PFS (pooled HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.21-4.54).
  • An association between postoperative ctDNA positivity and inferior OS was found (pooled HR 6.39, 95% CI 1.94-21.01).
  • No significant correlation could be documented for OS with baseline ctDNA.

Abstract

Abstract Background ctDNA is increasingly investigated as a biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but its role in guiding treatment decisions before, during, and after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) remains unclear. Aims This study aims to synthesize the current evidence on the predictive value of ctDNA in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDAC, with a particular focus on its potential to guide clinical decision-making before, during, and after NAT. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero: CRD420251013013) of studies evaluating ctDNA in patients with localized PDAC treated with NAT was conducted. Meta-analyses were performed for OS and PFS when ≥2 studies reported outcomes. Results 15 studies, representing 926 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Five studies measured ctDNA using a PCR-only assay, five using only NGS, and four studies used both methods. All studies targeted KRAS mutations for ctDNA assessment, with substantial heterogeneity in assay platforms, thresholds, and sampling timing. Baseline ctDNA detection ranged from 11-73% across resectability categories. Baseline ctDNA positivity was associated with worse PFS (2 studies, pooled HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.21-4.54), but association with OS could not be demonstrated (3 studies, pooled HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.96-2.37). An association between post-NAT ctDNA status and PFS or OS could not be quantitatively investigated. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with inferior OS (2 studies, pooled HR 6.39, 95% CI 1.94-21.01). Conclusion Evidence supporting ctDNA as a biomarker to guide NAT in localized PDAC is limited and inconsistent. Postoperative ctDNA was strongly associated with poor OS, whereas larger studies are needed to assess baseline and post-NAT ctDNA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aegerter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2269c9763171746d548508https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag055.027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prognostic impact of circulating tumor DNA in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.2026
  2. 2Prognostic Impact of Baseline Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  3. 3The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer2026 · 4 citations
  4. 4Use of serial ctDNA dynamics to predict clinical outcomes in metastatic and locally advanced PDAC: A systematic review.2026
  5. 5KRAS and TP53 Circulating Tumor DNA are Prognostic in Localized Pancreatic Cancer2026