Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction Refugees and migrant populations create ethical, substantive and methodological challenges for large- n survey research that standard survey designs and IRB frameworks often inadequately address. After 2015, the large-scale arrival of Syrian refugees in Europe offered both an analytically tractable cohort and an urgent ethical case for methodological innovation. Methods Drawing on the Refugee and European Cities Panel (2016–2022) across thirteen cities in Germany, Ireland, Sweden, and the UK, the study combined a two-wave panel of resettled Syrian refugees (leveraging quasi-random UNHCR placement) with parallel address-based surveys of host-community residents. Fieldwork combined address based sampling (ABS) with multi-stage sampling, collaboration with NGOs and humanitarian actors, iterative pretesting, and a participatory model that recruited and trained Syrian refugees—particularly students and women—as interviewers. IRB consultations and collaboration with psychologists and community leaders informed research procedures. Results Participatory adaptations such as collaborating with Syrian communities in these cities to define long and short term benefits and risks of the study, hiring and training Syrian refugees as interviewers and receiving their input during questionnaire development, among other ethically driven innovations, helped increase response rates and data quality, reduced item nonresponse on open questions, and shifted follow-up contact practices for the panel from email to more reliable phone methods. Interviewers gained training, mentoring, and tangible professional benefits. Discussion Treating ethics as a constitutive element of research design generated methodological gains while enhancing participant protection. However, the paper also reflects on tensions between standardization and local adaptation, risks to interviewer wellbeing, and persistent power asymmetries. Reflexive, ethics-driven participatory practices can strengthen both protection and empirical rigor in survey research with forcibly displaced populations.
Lasala‐Blanco et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: