PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 5, 20250 citations

Neuroscientific Support for Existential Realism: Memory, Anticipation, and the Present

View Full Paper
TTTenzin C. Trepp

Key Points

  • MAIN FINDING: The research supports the idea that only the present is ontologically existent according to existential realism.
  • KEY EVIDENCE: Cognitive neuroscience shows that the brain constructs time by integrating memory and anticipation into our perception of 'now'.
  • APPROACH: The paper combines insights from neuroscience with philosophical perspectives on time to analyze human cognition.
  • SIGNIFICANCE: This work helps clarify existential realism's framework by linking cognitive processes with our lived experience of time.

Abstract

Existential Realism (ER) is a present-centered ontological framework that distinguishes between existence, restricted to the present, and reality, which spans the causally or informationally relevant past and future. This paper explores how core processes of human temporal cognition—memory, anticipation, and the perception of the present—support ER’s framework. Insights from cognitive neuroscience suggest that the brain actively constructs time: the mind extends beyond the instantaneous now by retaining recent past information and projecting immediate future possibilities, all within a conscious “window of presence.” We examine how memory encodes past events both as physical traces in the brain and as reconstructed experiences in consciousness, how anticipation and predictive coding generate internal models of probable futures, and how our perception of ‘now’ is an integrated interval, not a dimensionless instant. These findings reinforce ER’s claim that only the present moment is ontologically existent, while past and future are real insofar as they are cognitively represented and integrated into the present through internal models. By linking philosophical ideas of time with empirical neuroscience, we show that human brains treat the past and future as parts of reality (through records and expectations) despite their lack of present existence. This interdisciplinary approach lends naturalistic support to Existential Realism’s view of time and offers a clearer understanding of why the present looms so large in experience even as past and future remain experientially—and ontologically—significant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tenzin C. Trepp (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0f93e6551bb0af8d1209https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d4pxa_v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future2020 · 1,169 citations
  2. 2Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science2013 · 6,086 citations
  3. 3The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?2010 · 8,241 citations
  4. 4Self-Organized Complexity and Coherent Infomax from the Viewpoint of Jaynes’s Probability Theory2012 · 40 citations
  5. 5To recognize shapes, first learn to generate images2007 · 306 citations