This study critically examines the methodology of Sheikh Mohammad Ali Al-Sabuni in interpreting legal verses of the Qur'an in his renowned work, Rawai’ al-Bayan. The research addresses the problem of understanding how Al-Sabuni integrates classical jurisprudential principles with contemporary legal and social challenges in his exegetical approach. Using a qualitative methodology based on textual analysis, the study delves into his use of linguistic tools, reliance on traditional Islamic jurisprudence, and contextual exegesis of Qur'anic legal verses. The objective of the research is to evaluate the distinctiveness, strengths, and limitations of Al-Sabuni's methodology and its applicability to modern contexts. The findings reveal that Al-Sabuni employs a thematic and multifaceted approach, balancing two primary methods: interpretation by tradition (tafsir bi’l-ma’thur) and interpretation by reasoned opinion (tafsir bi’l-ra’y). The study recommends a more comprehensive engagement with inter-school jurisprudential debates and a broader contextual framework to enhance the adaptability of his exegesis. These recommendations aim to further enrich the scholarly contribution of Rawai’ al-Bayan and encourage its use as a resource for addressing contemporary legal and ethical questions in Islamic jurisprudence.
Al-Riday et al. (2025) studied this question.