PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Advanced Theory and Simulations3 citations

Composition and Structure Based GGA Bandgap Prediction Using Machine Learning Approach

View Full Paper
MCMukesh K. ChoudharyARAditya RajGSGowri Sankar S

Key Points

  • The Random Forest model achieves an R2 of 0.943, indicating high prediction accuracy for the energy bandgap.
  • The ensemble model based on bagging reaches an R2 of 0.948, outperforming other models in bandgap prediction.
  • Feature engineering techniques utilized include Matminer and Pymatgen, enhancing model performance and insights.
  • Application of the models to predict band gaps of half-Heusler compounds could lead to advancements in optoelectronic materials.

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) regression models are developed to predict the energy bandgap of materials using only their chemical compositions and crystal structures. The study evaluates eight stand‐alone ML regression models and eleven ensemble models, four based on stacking and seven on bagging, incorporating Ridge regression with cross‐validation (RidgeCV) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator with cross‐validation (LassoCV). All models are trained on the matbench‐mp‐gap dataset from Matminer, which includes 106,113 compounds with energy band gaps computed using the generalized gradient approximation with the Perdew Burke Ernzerhof functional (GGA‐PBE). Feature engineering is performed using Matminer and Pymatgen, while feature importance and correlation are assessed through permutation and Pearson methods. Among the stand‐alone models, the Random Forest (RF) model achieves the highest accuracy with a maximum coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.943 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.504 eV. The best ensemble model, based on bagging, reaches R2 of 0.948 and RMSE of 0.479 eV. The model is applied to predict band gaps of new half‐Heusler (HH) compounds with 18 valence electrons. These predictions are validated through density functional theory (DFT) calculations without much computational effort, accelerating the discovery of potential optoelectronic materials from wide chemical space.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choudhary et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ae7754b1d3bfb60e6767https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202500771
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting band gap from chemical composition: a comparative study of machine learning and deep learning models2026
  2. 2Machine-learning-accelerated band gap prediction from chemical composition with near-experimental accuracy2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Bandgap prediction of non-metallic crystals through machine learning approach2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Estimation of Electronic Band Gap Energy From Material Properties Using Machine Learning2024
  5. 5Estimation of Electronic Band Gap Energy From Material Properties Using Machine Learning2024