Occupational burnout remains a critical workplace challenge with significant organizational and economic consequences. While workplace mental health programs (WMHPs) are widely implemented, their effectiveness in reducing burnout-related claims requires rigorous evaluation. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of WMHPs in reducing burnout-related symptoms. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to analyze WMHP efficacy. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and four other databases (2004-2025) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating WMHPs against controls. Two reviewers independently screened records using Covidence, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for quasi-experimental studies. This review included 14 studies that met inclusion criteria (nine RCTs, five quasi-experimental; total n = 3,572). Studies represented healthcare (n = 6), corporate (n = 5), and public sector (n = 3) settings, with moderate-high heterogeneity in interventions (mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), organizational restructuring) and outcomes (seven different burnout scales). Participatory organizational interventions reduced burnout for ≥12 months. Digital tools showed short-term benefits, but high attrition (42%), while brief workshops had no sustained effects beyond three months. Therefore, this review suggests that multi-level WMHPs combining individual and organizational strategies demonstrate the most robust evidence for burnout reduction, though effects vary by implementation quality. This underscores the need for tailored WMHPs that address both individual and structural workplace dynamics to mitigate burnout sustainably.
Bagasi et al. (2025) studied this question.