PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Latent Visual Reasoning

View Full Paper
BLBangzheng LiXSXimeng SunJLJiang Liu

Key Points

  • Latent visual reasoning enables direct reasoning in visual embedding space, enhancing visual understanding.
  • The model achieves a performance of 71.67% on visual question answering, outperforming the Qwen2.5-VL by 5%.
  • Using a visual encoder, images are transformed into visual tokens that facilitate autoregressive reasoning.
  • This new paradigm balances visual processing with text generation, supporting complex reasoning tasks.

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved notable gains in various tasks by incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in language spaces. Recent work extends this direction by leveraging external tools for visual editing, thereby enhancing the visual signal along the reasoning trajectories. Nevertheless, these approaches remain fundamentally constrained: reasoning is still confined to the language space, with visual information treated as static preconditions. We introduce Latent Visual Reasoning (LVR), a new paradigm that enables autoregressive reasoning directly in the visual embedding space. A visual encoder first projects images into visual tokens within a joint semantic space shared with the language model. The language model is then trained to generate latent states that reconstruct key visual tokens critical for answering the query, constituting the process of latent visual reasoning. By interleaving LVR with standard text generation, our model achieves substantial gains on perception-intensive visual question answering tasks. In addition, we adapt the GRPO algorithm to conduct reinforcement learning on latent reasoning, further balancing LVR and textual generation. We show that LVR substantially improves fine-grained visual understanding and perception, achieving 71.67% on MMVP compared to 66.67% with Qwen2.5-VL. Code base and model weights will be released later.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e861b07ef2f04ca37e4b1chttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.24251
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper