PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract A061: Longitudinal multimodal profiling of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma reveals the molecular evolution and cellular phenotypes underlying prognostically different treatment responses

View Full Paper
CLCalixto-Hope LucasNANadeem Al-AdliJYJacob Young

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the molecular evolution and cellular characteristics of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and how they affect treatment responses.
  • Evaluated paired initial and recurrent glioblastoma specimens from 106 patients
  • Performed histopathologic, genomic, and epigenomic analyses
  • Developed an epigenomic evolution signature correlating with clinical outcomes
  • Identified TERT promoter mutation and CDKN2A deletion as early events shared by tumors
  • Noted that EGFR, PTEN, and NF1 alterations were often specific to initial or recurrent tumors
  • Observed heterogeneous epigenomic evolution, with some glioblastomas becoming hypermethylated or hypomethylated
  • Patients with somatic hypermutation after temozolomide had longer intervals to recurrence and survival
  • Created an epigenomic signature linked to outcomes across 347 critical CpG sites.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Despite recent advances in the biology of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, it remains a devastating disease with median survival of less than two years. However, the molecular underpinnings of the heterogeneous response to the current standard-of-care treatment regimen consisting of maximal safe resection, adjuvant radiation, and chemotherapy with temozolomide remain unknown. Methods: Comprehensive histopathologic, genomic, and epigenomic evaluation of paired initial and recurrent glioblastoma specimens from 106 patients was performed to investigate the molecular evolution and cellular phenotypes underlying differential treatment responses. Results: While TERT promoter mutation and CDKN2A homozygous deletion were early events during gliomagenesis shared by initial and recurrent tumors, most other recurrent genetic alterations (e. g. EGFR, PTEN, NF1) were commonly private to initial or recurrent tumors indicating acquisition later during clonal evolution. Further, glioblastomas exhibited heterogeneous epigenomic evolution with subsets becoming more globally hypermethylated, hypomethylated, or remaining stable. Glioblastoma that underwent sarcomatous transformation had shorter interval to recurrence and were significantly enriched in NF1, TP53, and RB1 alterations and the Mesenchymal epigenetic class. Patients who developed somatic hypermutation following temozolomide treatment had significantly longer interval to disease recurrence and prolonged overall survival, and increased methylation at four specific CpG sites in the promoter region of MGMT was significantly associated with this development of hypermutation. Finally, an epigenomic evolution signature incorporating change in DNA methylation levels across 347 critical CpG sites was developed that significantly correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Glioblastoma undergoes heterogeneous genetic, epigenetic, and cellular evolution that underlies prognostically different treatment responses. Citation Format: Calixto-Hope Lucas, Nadeem Al-Adli, Jacob Young, Rohit Gupta, Ramin Morshed, Jasper Wu, Ajay Ravindranathan, Anny Shai, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush, Jennie Taylor, John de Groot, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Melike Pekmezci, Philip Theodosopoulos, Manish Aghi, Edward Chang, Shawn Hervey-Jumper, David Raleigh, Annette Molinaro, Joseph Costello, Aaron Diaz, Jennifer Clarke, Nicholas Butowski, Joanna Phillips, Susan Chang, Mitchel Berger, David A. Solomon. Longitudinal multimodal profiling of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma reveals the molecular evolution and cellular phenotypes underlying prognostically different treatment responses abstract. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer; 2026 Mar 23-25; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (6Suppl): Abstract nr A061.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lucas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b62b34aaaeb1a67dc4ahttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.brain26-a061
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper