PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Medical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Histopathological Changes Following Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (NexoBrid®): A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

View Full Paper
SAStefana Avadanei-LucaDMDan-Cristian MoraruABAndra-Irina Bulgaru-Iliescu

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze histological findings following bromelain-based enzymatic debridement in thermal burns.
  • Conducted systematic searches of preclinical and clinical studies in various databases.
  • Included studies focused on thermal burns treated with bromelain-based debridement and provided histological analysis.
  • Quality of studies assessed using established risk of bias tools.
  • Six preclinical studies showed selective eschar removal with dermal preservation.
  • Clinical data included only two studies with nine patients, revealing upper dermal homogenization.
  • Notable findings include accelerated re-epithelialization and preservation of the dermis.

Abstract

Background: NexoBrid® (NXB; MediWound Ltd., Yavne, Israel) (anacaulase-bcdb) is a bromelain-based enzymatic debriding agent approved for eschar removal in burn care. Despite widespread clinical use, histological evidence of tissue-level changes after enzymatic debridement remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate preclinical and clinical studies describing histological findings following bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of thermal burns. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we performed parallel systematic searches of preclinical (animal) and clinical (human) studies across PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Included studies reported thermal burns treated with bromelain-based enzymatic debridement and tissue biopsies with histological analysis. Quality was assessed using the SYRCLE Risk of Bias Tool (preclinical) and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists (clinical). Results: Six preclinical studies (five porcine, one rat) met inclusion criteria. Findings included: selective eschar removal with dermal preservation; protection of the zone of stasis (67% partial- vs. 100% full-thickness necrosis; p = 0.05); viable dermal thickness of 1.1 ± 0.7 mm; and accelerated re-epithelialization (7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 9.1 ± 2.1 days; p < 0.05). Only two clinical studies (n = 9 patients) met the inclusion criteria: one case series (n = 8) and one case report. Clinical findings showed upper dermal homogenisation with preserved deep dermis, vascular congestion correlating with pinpoint bleeding, and pseudoeschar formation via transepidermal elimination. Conclusions: Preclinical evidence supports selective enzymatic debridement with dermal preservation. However, clinical histological data are limited to nine patients after over 13 years of use. This highlights a critical translational gap and underscores the need for prospective clinical histological studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Avadanei-Luca et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37ba2b34aaaeb1a67e3a0https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14010157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper