PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

La Profilée - Independent Measurement of Frame Strength and Coupling Efficiency

View Full Paper
MMMarc Maibom

Key Points

  • The aim is to provide independent measurement protocols for frame strength across multiple systems, ensuring they can be evaluated without prior knowledge of outcomes.
  • Derives measurement protocols for frame strength across organisational, biological, and individual domains.
  • Defines frame strength through structural observables independent of performance outcomes.
  • Specifies proxy variables and measurement procedures for each domain.
  • Establishes that frame strength can be assessed without knowing a system's current state of overload.
  • Demonstrates that structural properties can provide stable measures of frame strength, justifying their use in diagnostics.

Abstract

La Profilée (LP) establishes a universal persistence condition IR = R / (F · I · C) ≤ 1, where F denotes Frame strength — the structural fraction of total integration capacity directed toward identity preservation. Prior publications have operationalized IR diagnostically, but F has been measured primarily through its consequences: when IK collapses and IR rises, F is inferred to have been low. This post-hoc measurement is structurally permissible but epistemically insufficient for two purposes: independent falsification of LP's structural mapping, and prospective diagnostic use before collapse is visible. This paper derives and specifies independent measurement protocols for F across three domains — organisational systems, biological systems, and persons. In each domain, F is defined through structural observables that are logically prior to and causally independent of IR trajectory: they can be assessed without knowing whether the system is in overload, without reference to outcomes, and without presupposing the validity of LP. The protocols specify concrete proxy variables, measurement procedures, and independence criteria. The central claim is: F is independently measurable through the stability and invariance of the structural properties that define what the system is — not through what the system produces. For organisations, this means governance structure and strategic invariance. For biological systems, homeostatic set-point maintenance and conserved regulatory architecture. For persons, self-concept clarity and values congruence. In each case, the measurement is structurally justified, not merely stipulated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb7b016edfba7beb89d07https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19339661
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper