PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities

View Full Paper
JWJianying WangZFZunwei Fu Zunwei FuLWL. Z. Wang

Key Points

  • The review aims to understand how urban green space influences mental health and to identify methodological and governance strategies for promoting sustainable cities.
  • Synthesis of 93 empirical studies and 929 bibliometric records
  • Identification of six validated pathways connecting urban green space to mental health
  • Analysis of methodological trends using spatial and causal models
  • Bibliometric mapping to explore interdisciplinary and geographic trends
  • Development of a governance-oriented framework for equitable green access
  • Identified six pathways linking urban green space to improved mental health outcomes
  • Notable shift toward advanced measurement techniques like AI-enabled prediction
  • Challenges include spatial and temporal misalignment of exposure and outcomes
  • Need for interdisciplinary approaches and cross-cultural applicability
  • Proposed governance framework to enhance equitable access and planning for sustainable cities

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) is a critical component of sustainable cities and a modifiable determinant of mental health (MH). This review synthesizes 93 empirical studies and 929 bibliometric records to map theoretical advances, methodological evolution, and governance implications in the UGS–MH field. We integrate the following six validated pathways into a unified socio-ecological framework: attention restoration, stress recovery, behavioral activation, physiological regulation, social cohesion, and environmental buffering. Methodological trends indicate a shift from static greenness proxies to street-view and multimodal exposure measures, and from cross-sectional correlations to models that address spatial heterogeneity, causal identification, and AI-enabled prediction. Bibliometric mapping reveals increasing interdisciplinarity, geographic diversification, and growing attention to dynamic exposure science. Persistent challenges include spatial and temporal misalignment between exposure and outcome measures, reliance on single-modality indicators, limited causal inference, and constrained cross-cultural generalizability. Building on these findings, we propose a governance-oriented framework to support sustainable and healthy cities through equitable green access, behavior-informed planning, nature-based interventions, and data-driven decision support. Overall, this review strengthens the bridge from evidence to action at the interface of urban sustainability and population mental health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb7c216edfba7beb89db0https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper