PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 3, 2011Cochrane library458 citationsOpen Access

Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews

View Full Paper
THTanya HorsleyODOrvie DingwallMSMargaret Sampson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There is some evidence to support the use of checking reference lists for locating studies in systematic reviews. However, this evidence is derived from weak study designs. In situations where the identification of all relevant studies through handsearching and database searching is difficult, it would seem prudent that authors of reviews check reference lists to supplement their searching. The challenge, therefore, is for review authors to recognize those situations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Horsley et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8a75152654bb436d199fdhttps://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.mr000026.pub2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1BEYOND MEDLINE2003 · 105 citations
  2. 2Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model2007 · 196 citations
  3. 3THE ART AND SCIENCE OF SEARCHING MEDLINE TO ANSWER CLINICAL QUESTIONS Finding the Right Number of Articles1999 · 51 citations
  4. 4The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature1990 · 187 citations
  5. 5Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2008 · 25,253 citations