PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Urolithiasis2 citationsOpen Access

Risk factors and a predictive model for steinstrasse formation after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis

FÇFerhat ÇobanHKHüseyin KutluKAKağan Türker AKBABA

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a predictive model for steinstrasse formation following shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric patients.
  • Conducted a two-center retrospective analysis with 807 pediatric patients undergoing ESWL from 2015 to 2025.
  • Evaluated 26 preoperative variables to identify predictors of steinstrasse.
  • Utilized consensus-based feature selection and tested 13 machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, with nested cross-validation.
  • Assessed model interpretability using SHAP, LIME, and partial dependence analyses.
  • The overall incidence of steinstrasse was found to be 10.5% (85 out of 807 patients).
  • Nine key predictors were identified, including age, stone characteristics, and the S.T.O.N.E. and Triple-D Scores.
  • XGBoost showed optimal performance with an AUC of 0.949, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 99.1%.
  • The model demonstrated excellent generalizability with a ΔAUC of 0.001 and confirmed clinical utility through decision curve analysis.

Abstract

Steinstrasse is an important complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; however, predictive models for risk factors in pediatric populations remain limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an explainable machine learning model for predicting steinstrasse formation after ESWL in children. This two-center retrospective study included 807 pediatric patients (< 18 years) who underwent ESWL for renal stones (2015–2025). The internal cohort comprised 685 patients (Adıyaman), while the external validation cohort consisted of 122 patients (Adana). Twenty-six preoperative variables were evaluated. Optimal predictors were identified through consensus-based feature selection using eight algorithms. Thirteen machine learning algorithms were compared using nested cross-validation. Model interpretability was assessed through SHAP, LIME, and partial dependence analyses. The overall steinstrasse incidence was 10.5% (85/807). Nine predictors were selected: S.T.O.N.E. Score, Triple-D Score, age, stone perimeter, stone depth, Hounsfield unit, stone volume, distal ureteral diameter, and skin-to-stone distance. XGBoost demonstrated optimal external validation performance (AUC = 0.949, sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 99.1%, MCC = 0.891) and exhibited excellent generalizability (ΔAUC = 0.001). Explainable artificial intelligence analyses identified age (mean|SHAP|=1.965) and distal ureteral diameter (mean|SHAP|=1.575) as dominant predictors with significant interaction (SHAP = 0.458). Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility across a threshold range of 2%–98%. This externally validated model accurately predicts steinstrasse formation using routine preoperative parameters. Integration of patient age, ureteral anatomy, and stone characteristics may guide decisions between ESWL, prophylactic stenting, or alternative endoscopic approaches in pediatric patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Çoban et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db380f4fe01fead37c63dfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-01975-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper