PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2021Food Additives & Contaminants Part A48 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of heavy metals in wild and farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on Lake Kariba, Zambia: implications for human and fish health

View Full Paper
CSChalumba Kachusi SimukokoUniversity of ZambiaEMEliezer Brown MwakalapaMbeya University of Science and TechnologyPBPatricia BwalyaMinistry of Agriculture and Livestock

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the levels of heavy metals in both wild and farmed tilapia on Lake Kariba in Zambia and to evaluate the impact of intensive fish farming on wild tilapia. Three sites for wild fish (2 distant and 1 proximal to fish farms) and two fish farms were selected. One hundred fish (52 from distant sites; 20 near fish farms; 28 farmed fish) were sampled and muscle tissues excised for analysis of heavy metals (Mg, Fe, Zn, Al, Cu, Se, Co, Mo, As, Cr, V, Ni, Hg, Pb, Li, Cd, and Ag) by acid (HNO3) digestion and ICP-MS. All metals were found to be below the maximum limits (MLs) set by WHO/EU. Essential metals were higher in farmed tilapia, whereas non-essential metals were higher in wild tilapia. Significantly higher levels of essential metals were found in wild fish near the fish farms than those distant from the farms. Estimated weekly intake (EWI) for all metals were less than the provisional tolerable weekly intakes (PTWI). Target hazard quotients (THQ) and Hazard Indices (HI) were <1, indicating no health risks from a lifetime of fish consumption. Selenium Health Benefit Value (HBVSe) was positive for all locations, indicating protective effects of selenium against mercury in fish. Total cancer risk (CR) due to As, Cr, Cd, Ni and Pb was less than 1 × 10−4, indicating less than 1 in 10,000 carcinogenic risk from a lifetime consumption of tilapia from Lake Kariba. Hg levels (0.021 mg/kg) in wild tilapia at site 1 were higher than the Environmental quality standard (EQS = 0.020 mg/kg) set by EU, indicating possible risk of adverse effects to fish. Except for Hg, levels of metals in fish were safe for human consumption and had no adverse effects on fish.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simukoko et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddb0cda3a29ee41a99b3a3https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2021.1975830
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The role of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives (JECFA) in establishment of mycotoxin regulation2009 · 13 citations
  2. 2Aquaculture Industry in China: Current State, Challenges, and Outlook2011 · 180 citations
  3. 3Correlation of MT Levels in Livers and Gills with Heavy Metals in Wild Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) from the Klang River, Malaysia2014 · 25 citations
  4. 4Determination of differential heavy metal and trace element accumulation in liver, gills, intestine and muscle of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) from the Danube River in Serbia by ICP-OES2010 · 229 citations
  5. 5Mercury and selenium in European catfish (Silurus glanis) from Northern Italian Rivers: Can molar ratio be a predictive factor for mercury toxicity in a top predator?2014 · 59 citations