PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Translational Behavioral Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating an online-delivered resistance exercise intervention for racially diverse breast cancer survivors using the RE-AIM framework

View Full Paper
IWIsabel L WakefieldOSOcéane StreubelALAdana A. M. Llanos

Key Points

  • To evaluate the feasibility and effects of an online resistance exercise intervention for racially diverse breast cancer survivors using the RE-AIM framework.
  • Used a mixed methods approach with a pre–post-study design.
  • Assessed sociodemographic representativeness, physical function, and session fidelity.
  • Conducted qualitative interviews to identify barriers and facilitators of adoption.
  • Intervention enrolled 47 racially diverse breast cancer survivors.
  • Participants showed significant improvements in upper- and lower-body physical function (P = .009 and P = .003, respectively) versus control group.
  • Adoption facilitators included convenience and trainer support, while barriers included equipment challenges and competing priorities.

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast cancer survivors (BCS) experience persistent physical and psychological effects after treatment, with racially diverse groups demonstrating lower adherence to cancer-specific resistance exercise guidelines. Online resistance exercise interventions show promise for enhancing accessibility and health outcomes among BCS. However, evidence regarding their feasibility of implementation remains limited. Yet, such information is critical for assessing scalability and implementation in non-laboratory settings. Purpose Using the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework, this study evaluated the reach, efficacy, adoption, and implementation of a 12-week, supervised, online resistance exercise intervention for racially diverse BCS. Methods A mixed methods approach with a pre–post-study design was used. Quantitative outcomes included sociodemographic representativeness (reach), physical function (efficacy), and session fidelity (implementation). Qualitative interviews examined participant experiences, barriers, and facilitators (adoption). Results The intervention enrolled a racially diverse BCS sample (N = 47; 57.4% White, 23.4% Black, 14.8% Asian) that was mostly representative of the host institution catchment area, though participants had higher education levels. The intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in upper- (P = .009) and lower-body physical function (P = .003) versus control, only. Adoption facilitators included program convenience, accessibility of online delivery, and trainer support, while barriers were equipment challenges, competing priorities, and cancer-related side effects. Program implementation fidelity was high for core components. Conclusions Key factors contributed to the feasibility of implementation of the intervention. Future remote exercise interventions should address equipment needs, individualized support, and tailored recruitment to enhance adoption and facilitate scalability in non-laboratory settings. Clinical Trial Information The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04562233.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wakefield et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3209340886becb653fa4dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibag019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper