PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Wiggly Curve of Agile Change

View Full Paper
DVDavid Viney

Key Points

  • This framework explores how agile transformations disrupt performance through cumulative cognitive load.
  • Extends the J-Curve of Change into agile contexts
  • Analyzes the impact of agile sprint cadence on performance
  • Integrates theories such as Kahneman's dual-process and Zeigarnik effect
  • Identifies a gap between the achieved and desired states in agile transformations
  • Demonstrates that smaller, repeated changes create greater cognitive burden than single large changes
  • Argues for continuous change management strategies rather than episodic approaches.

Abstract

The Wiggly Curve of Agile Change is a practitioner framework extending the author’s J-Curve of Change (Viney, 2005) into the context of iterative and agile technology delivery. It proposes that agile sprint cadence does not eliminate the performance disruption described by the J-Curve — it distributes it. Rather than a single large performance dip, organisations undergoing agile transformation experience a series of smaller oscillations repeated at sprint cadence, producing cumulative cognitive load that is difficult to observe in aggregate. Without deliberate change management, this cumulative effect produces a measurable gap between the end state actually achieved and the desired state: what the author terms the ‘dead loss of poor adoption’. The framework challenges the prevalent assumption that agile methods render structured change management unnecessary, drawing on Kahneman’s dual-process theory and the Zeigarnik effect to explain why many small changes may impose a greater total cognitive burden on affected individuals than a single large one. The paper argues that agile does not make change management redundant — it makes it differently necessary: persistent rather than episodic, embedded rather than separate, and focused on minimising the residual cognitive load of continuous iteration rather than managing a single transformational dip.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David Viney (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866f16e0dea528ddeb3f3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665920
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper