PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 20262 citations

CHOLEBLADEUS: long-term results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder versus bile duct drainage of malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: a propensity-matched study.

View Full Paper
ADAntoine DebourdeauJAJérémie AlbouysJPJocelyn Privat

Key Points

  • To compare the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS in patients with malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP.
  • Propensity-matched analysis of 200 patients (100 per group)
  • Technical success measured for EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS
  • Assessments of biliary patency and reintervention-free survival at 12 months
  • Biliary patency at 12 months was 86.2% for EUS-GBD vs. 63.8% for EUS-CDS (P=0.01)
  • Biliary reintervention-free survival significantly longer with EUS-GBD (P<0.001)
  • Overall survival and procedural adverse events were comparable between groups.

Abstract

Before matching, 294 patients were included (142 EUS-GBD; 152 EUS-CDS). After matching, 200 patients were analyzed (100 per group). Technical success was 100% for EUS-GBD and 97% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.25). Clinical success was 80.5% for EUS-GBD and 90.6% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.08). At 12 months, the probability of biliary patency was significantly higher with EUS-GBD than EUS-CDS (86.2% 95%CI 74.2%-92.9% vs. 63.8% 95%CI 49.5-75.0; P = 0.01). Biliary reintervention-free survival was significantly longer with EUS-GBD (log-rank, P P = 0.61), delayed AEs in 27.0% vs. 30.0% (P = 0.75), and reintervention rates were comparable (23.0% vs. 26.0%; P = 0.74). Overall survival did not differ significantly (log-rank, P = 0.59). Conclusion In patients with MDBO after failed ERCP, EUS-GBD achieved higher 12-month biliary patency than EUS-CDS, with comparable rates of technical and clinical success, morbidity, reintervention, and overall survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Debourdeau et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd64fede9185760d416chttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-2837-9342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided choledochoduodenostomy vs. EUS‐guided gallbladder drainage for jaundice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Retrospective, multicenter study (GALLBLADEUS Study)2024 · 38 citations
  2. 2Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder versus bile duct drainage for first-line therapy of malignant biliary obstruction: international multicenter trial2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3EUS-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue in distal malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis2025 · 12 citations
  4. 4Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification2021 · 318 citations
  5. 5Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis2017 · 412 citations