PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Brain Research0 citationsOpen Access

The influence of speaker accent on the neurocognitive processing of politeness

View Full Paper
PLPeter C H LamHCHaining CuiMPMarc D. Pell

Key Points

  • Listeners showed rapid neural responses to accents, reflecting differing perceptions of politeness.
  • The interaction of speaker accent and prosodic politeness influenced ERPs on both P200 and N400 components.
  • Participants' decision-making about request compliance varied based on the speaker's linguistic background.
  • Accent and the degree of politeness impacted how requests were processed and evaluated neurologically.

Abstract

Does speaking with a foreign accent alter how listeners respond to verbal requests? Cooperative outcomes depend on multiple social factors, such as the politeness of the speaker who makes a request (e.g., their tone of voice). However, little is known about how indexical features derived from the speaker's voice influence neurocognitive operations during politeness communication. In an event-related potential (ERP) study, 31 participants listened to requests ("Please lend me a nickel") that varied in prosodic politeness (polite/rude), imposition level (low/high cost to perform an action), and accent (native/foreign English speaker). In separate rating tasks, participants made a social inference (speaker friendliness) or pragmatic inference (likelihood of request compliance) about each request based on available speech cues. ERPs time-locked to request onset revealed an interaction of speaker accent and prosodic (im)politeness on the P200 component (180-260 ms) and the subsequent late positivity (450-700 ms). Findings pointed to rapid perceptual differentiation of the speaker's linguistic status and stance (P200), after which listeners attended more deeply to attitudinal cues expressed by native ingroup speakers. ERPs evoked by the sentence-final imposition word showed that speaker characteristics influenced how the "cost" of requests was later evaluated, hampering N400 semantic operations (300-500 ms) when speakers acted rudely or had a foreign accent-conditions less frequently associated with cooperative interactions. Selective uptake of particular social cues relevant for drawing social versus pragmatic inferences about requests was also noted. Our data identify a time course and brain mechanisms that integrate speaker and message during politeness communication.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lam et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1cc4754b1d3bfb60f4eaahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149897
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Association Between Speech Rate and Politeness2026
  2. 2Expecting politeness: perceptions of voice assistant politeness2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Comparing the roles of f0, speech rate, and timbre in expressing and perceiving politeness in Mandarin speech2026
  4. 4Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing2025
  5. 5A Cognitive Study on Politeness Intention Processing and Its Association with Pragmatic Failure in Cross-Cultural Communication2024