What question did this study set out to answer?

该研究旨在探讨意识对于人工智能福祉的必要性。

February 8, 2026Open Access

意识是人工智能福利的必要条件吗？

Key Points

该研究旨在探讨意识对于人工智能福祉的必要性。
分析Goldstein和Kirk–Giannini关于无意识人工智能福利的论证。
评估关于意识与福祉的反论点。
讨论界定人工智能主体资格的影响。
得出结论：意识对于有意义的人工智能福利至关重要。
强调拒绝意识在人工智能福祉中的地位所带来的反直觉问题。
确认感知能力是人工智能福利主体资格的必要条件。

Abstract

摘要 Goldstein和Kirk–Giannini最近提出，人工语言代理即使没有现象意识也能拥有福祉。在这里，我对他们的立场提出质疑，认为他们的论证未能证明意识对福祉并非必需。此外，他们的论点产生了比他们归因于要求意识作为福利主体资格的观点更为反直觉且问题更严重的结论。因此，应仍将意识（或更确切地说，感知能力）视为人工智能福利的必要条件。

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Social Feed

Authors

Walter Veit

Journals

Asian Journal of Philosophy

Actions

Institutions

University of Reading

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Walter Veit（Thu，）研究了这一问题。

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698827c90fc35cd7a8846cb8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00382-3

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

The sentience shift in animal research· 2022 · 37 citations
How to Count Animals, more or less· 2019 · 247 citations
A Philosophy for the Science of Animal Consciousness· 2023 · 77 citations
The experience requirement on well-being· 2020 · 39 citations
Human Zombies are Metaphysically Impossible· 2006 · 4 citations

意识是人工智能福利的必要条件吗？

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Social Feed

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider